Working with Data
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Working with Data (SOCW 6311) is a course that teaches you how to work with data.
Data Analysis I (Week 4)
For some students, conducting statistical analysis can be a daunting task. Statistical analysis, on the other hand, is an important part of social work research because it allows researchers to link interventions to client outcomes. The task of mathematical computations is made easier with statistical analysis software. It is the responsibility of the social worker to select the appropriate research design and statistical analysis.
In a case study this week, you examine the relationship between study design and statistical analysis. You must also interpret the research findings from the case study and the SPSS data provided to you.
Students will be able to:
In a case study, interpret the statistical results.
Examine the connection between study design and statistical analysis.
Resources for Learning
Readings that are required
J. R. Dudley, J. R. Dudley, J. R. Dudley (2020). Oxford University Press, Social Work Evaluation: Improving What We Do (3rd ed.).
Is the Intervention Effective? (Chapter 9) (See pp. 226235 for more information.) (From “Determining a Causal Relationship” to “Practice Outcome Evaluations”)
S.-B. Plummer, S. Makris, and S. Brocksen (Eds.). (2014b). Case studies in social work: Concentration year Laureate International Universities Publishing, Baltimore, MD. [e-reader from Vital Source]
The following section should be read:
Social Work Research: Chi Square (pp. 6365); Social Work Research: Chi Square (pp. 6365); Social Work Research: Chi Square (pp
J. T. Stocks, J. T. Stocks, J. T. Stocks, J. T. (2010). Social workers’ statistics. The handbook of social work research methods (2nd ed., pp. 75118), edited by B. Thyer. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (PDF)
Sage Publications, Inc. owns the copyright to this work. Sage Publications, Inc. granted permission to reprint this article via the Copyright Clearance Center.
W. M. K. Trochim, W. M. K. Trochim, W. M. K. Tro (2006). Internal validity is when something is true on the inside. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/intval.php was retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/intval.php.
Make sure you click on all of the links in the story.
Handout for Week 4: A Short Course in Statistics (PDF)
Handout: Chi-Square findings from Week 4 (PDF)
Working with Data is an assignment.
Statistical analysis software is a useful tool for researchers who need to perform complex calculations. However, in order to effectively use such a tool, the study must be well-designed. All of the relationships in the study must be understood by the social worker. He or she must be aware of the study’s objectives and choose the most appropriate design. The social worker must accurately represent the relationship under investigation as well as the variables at play. Finally, he or she must correctly enter those variables into the software program. This assignment will allow you to examine the decisions made in the case study “Social Work Research: Chi Square” in depth, as well as the relationship between study design and statistical analysis. Assume that the data has been entered into SPSS and that the chi-square results have been given to you. (For more information, see the Week 4 Handout: Chi-Square Results.)
Review the Week 4 Handout: Chi-Square Findings and follow the instructions to prepare for this Assignment.
By the seventh day,
Please submit a one-page paper that includes the following:
An examination of the relationship between the study design and the statistical analysis used in the case study, which includes the following:
An explanation of why you believe the agency should have developed a plan to evaluate the program.
An explanation of why the social work agency in the case study decided to use a chi square statistic to see if there was a difference between those who participated in the program and those who did not (Hint: Think about the level of measurement of the variables)
A description of the research design for each group in terms of observations (O) and interventions (X).
Interpret the data from the chi-square test. What conclusions can be drawn from the data about the program?
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.