- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaybasket.com
Using WIFI System Proposal Paper
Using WIFI System Proposal Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Using WIFI System Proposal Paper
Proposal idea: My pitch is to convince my university president to invest in an updated/brand new WIFI system for the entire campus. The existing WIFI system is not efficient, students and professors complain the WIFI not working constantly.
Task: Write a proposal paper to persuade the university president to invest in a better WIFI system. Please research WIFI technology, costs, time frame to implement on campus, installment process and other important convincing ideas. Idea is to sell the product to university. Please provide facts and relevant sources (MLA style). There is no page minimum or maximum. I just need covered all aspects my professor requires below please!
-Title page
-Executive summary: Again, as with the group project, the purpose here is that if the recipient does not initially have the time to read the entire proposal, the executive summary provides the must-knows in a succinct fashion: what’s being proposed, cost, hoped-for outcome.
-Table of Contents
-List of Illustrations (list of photographs, drawings, tables, or other types of illustrations used to support the content)
-Introduction: This is not just an explanation of the proposal. This is where you start selling, trying to convince the recipient that there is a need and/or demand for what you’re proposing. A common tool is to begin with a narrative.
* For example, you’re proposing a parking garage for campus, so you begin your introduction thusly:
“You’re a student, carrying a full load, and like most of your peers, are also juggling your schoolwork with a job. Managing your time carefully is the key to balancing it all. But it never fails: you arrive on campus an hour before your first class and STILL can’t find parking. You cruise from one lot to the next, an eye out for any car that looks like it’s pulling out.
You see other students in their cars, you stop, thinking they’re going to pull out but then you realize that they’re camped out in their car, having gotten to the lot hours before their first class to grab a spot. This, you think, was mentioned during the campus tour…”
And then you go on to pitch building a parking garage as a solution.
-Body: Ok, now this is where your proposal turns into an evidence-backed argument. You’re presenting facts, supporting evidence that proves there is a problem/demand, outline your proposed project, and supply more support to show why it’ll work.
You’re also detailing how the project will play out: construction (if any), any required licenses or permits, etc. — everything someone would need to know to know how this would work. And of course, most vital, costs.
You also anticipate objections and pre-empty them by addressing them. The two most typical objections are that the risk seems unreasonable, and cost. You have to justify both. If you can find, besides statistical evidence and authoritative opinion, examples of similar projects that worked, that’s the best sort of evidence: “It worked there, it should work here!”
-Conclusion: Is actually more of a summation: “So, when you measure the cost against the projected benefit and see how such a project worked elsewhere, it’s hard to say no.”
And that, in the end, is what you’re attempting to do: take away their reasons for saying no. You want to make it difficult for them to say no, to make them feel that if they walk away from this, they’re missing out on a plus.
-Appendix: Again, as in the group report, you might not have this, but if there are articles that support your case, or that tell a similar story, or anything particularly relevant that would be of interest to someone considering your proposal, it goes here.
-Bibliography: For some of you, these may not be published sources. If, for example, you work for an organization and are using first-hand knowledge, obviously that’s something that wouldn’t be listed (but will be accounted for in another element; we’ll get to that). If you gain information from talking to someone, there is an MLA format for interviews. If you need it, let me know at the time and I’ll lay it out for you.
Using WIFI System Proposal Paper
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
