- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaybasket.com
Traveling Salesperson for Aimer Winery Case Study
Traveling Salesperson for Aimer Winery Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Traveling Salesperson for Aimer Winery Case Study
Request: Read the following case together with the scenarios in the attached document. It is vital to read all this information as the questions is very specific to
that file so you need to be aware of that information. There are 4 questions which need to be answered in relation to business law field. I divided in the document
each information based on the question so it can be easier for you to follow the task.
Traveling Salesperson for Aimer Winery Case Study
undefined
Case: “Rick Saldana worked as a traveling salesperson for Aimer Winery. Sales constituted 90 percent of Saldana’s work time. Saldana worked an average of fifty
hours per week but received no overtime pay. Saldana had worked for Aimer for ten years when his new supervisor, Caesar Braxton, claimed that he had been
inflating his reported sales calls and required him to submit to a polygraph test. Saldana reported Braxton to the U.S. Department of Labor, which prohibited Aimer
from requiring Saldana to take a polygraph test for this purpose. Shortly after that, Saldana’s wife, Venita, fell from a ladder and sustained a head injury while
employed as a full-time agricultural harvester. Saldana presented Aimer’s human resources department with a letter from his wife’s physician indicating that she
would need daily care for several months, and Saldana took leave for three months. Aimer had sixty-three employees at that time. When Saldana returned to
Aimer, he was informed that his position had been eliminated because his sales territory had been combined with an adjacent territory”
Traveling Salesperson for Aimer Winery Case Study
undefined
Read The Case “Practice and Review: Employment Law” with Rick Saldana and Aimer Winery. Answer the questions stated below. List A, B, C, and D for your answers. Your responses should be in complete sentences (not just “yes” or “no”) and clearly explain the rationale for your answers. Even though there are no words limits, it should be an in-depth answer supported by academic references. Remember to use the textbook as a reference, as the concepts discussed in the scenario are based on the chapter 20 information. See Grading Rubric below.
Traveling Salesperson for Aimer Winery Case Study
undefined
Answer Questions A-D:
undefined
- Discuss if Rick Saldana would be able to take time off to care for his wife, Venita, after her fall. If so, how much time could he take? Briefly discuss what governs time off for employees, and why or why not Saldana would be able to take time off for his wife.
- Traveling Salesperson for Aimer Winery Case Study
undefined
- Briefly describe the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) and the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). Rick Saldana is considering applying for unemployment compensation and COBRA. Would he most likely be eligible to receive unemployment and COBRA? Explain your answers, and why or why not Saldana would be eligible.
undefined
- C. Provide a definition of employment at will. Would Rick Saldana likely be covered under employment at will? Why or why not?
undefined
- Refer to chapter 20, section 20-2. Given the scenario described in the case, should Aimer Winery had paid overtime wages to Rick Saldana? Why or why not? Explain your rationale.
Traveling Salesperson for Aimer Winery Case Study
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Traveling Salesperson for Aimer Winery Case Study
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
