The impact of fracking on the environment and public health
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
The impact of fracking on the environment and public health
Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is a method of extracting natural gas and oil from shale formations deep underground. While proponents of fracking tout its economic benefits and its potential to reduce dependence on foreign oil, opponents raise concerns about its environmental impact, particularly with regard to public health. In this blog, we will explore the potential impact of fracking on the environment and public health, and highlight some of the challenges associated with regulating this controversial practice.
Environmental Impact of Fracking
Water Pollution: One of the most significant environmental concerns associated with fracking is water pollution. The fracking process involves injecting large amounts of water, sand, and chemicals into underground rock formations to release trapped gas and oil. This process can contaminate nearby water sources, either through accidental spills or through leakage from poorly constructed wells. Contaminants can include heavy metals, radioactive materials, and volatile organic compounds, which can pose serious risks to human health.
Air Pollution: Fracking also has the potential to contribute to air pollution, particularly through the release of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Other pollutants associated with fracking include nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and volatile organic compounds. These pollutants can contribute to smog, which can exacerbate respiratory problems, and have been linked to a range of health problems, including cancer.
Land Use: Fracking requires large amounts of land, water, and resources, and can disrupt natural ecosystems. Drilling sites can fragment habitats, reduce biodiversity, and alter soil and water quality. The construction of pipelines and infrastructure associated with fracking can also have negative impacts on local communities and ecosystems.
Public Health Impacts of Fracking
Waterborne Illness: Water pollution associated with fracking can lead to a range of health problems, including waterborne illnesses such as giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis. Exposure to contaminated water can also increase the risk of certain types of cancer, particularly those of the liver, bladder, and lung.
Respiratory Problems: Air pollution associated with fracking can exacerbate respiratory problems, particularly for those with preexisting conditions such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Air pollution can also increase the risk of lung cancer, particularly for those living near fracking sites.
Occupational Health Risks: Workers involved in fracking operations can be exposed to a range of health risks, including exposure to silica dust, which can cause lung disease, and exposure to volatile organic compounds, which can cause skin and eye irritation, headaches, and dizziness.
Challenges of Regulating Fracking
Despite the potential environmental and public health impacts of fracking, regulating this practice can be challenging. Some of the reasons for this include:
Industry Influence: The oil and gas industry wields significant political power and has lobbied against regulations that could potentially limit their profits. This has made it difficult for lawmakers to pass regulations that adequately address the potential risks associated with fracking.
Limited Data: The long-term impacts of fracking are not well understood, and more research is needed to fully understand the environmental and public health risks associated with this practice. This makes it difficult to develop effective regulations.
State vs. Federal Regulation: The regulation of fracking is largely left to individual states, which can lead to inconsistencies in regulation and monitoring. Some states have weaker regulations than others, and this can create a race to the bottom in terms of environmental and public health protections.
Fracking has the potential to provide significant economic benefits, but it also has the potential to cause significant harm to the environment and public health. While some argue that these risks can be mitigated through regulation, others argue that the potential risks are too great to justify continuing with this practice. As we continue to grapple with this issue, it is important to prioritize the health and safety of
The impact of fracking on the environment and public health
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.