- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaybasket.com
Strayer Organizational Issue Story Research Paper
Strayer Organizational Issue Story Research Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Strayer Organizational Issue Story Research Paper
Overview
Your final course project will be a fully detailed, descriptive, and evidence-based story of your organizational issue drawing on the assignments and activities you have completed in the course so far. It will include descriptive background and context about the organization and the issue.
Instructions
DEVELOP THE WEEK 9 ASSIGNMENT BY FOLLOWING THE DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS WITHIN THE ANNOTATED TEMPLATE WITH INSTRUCTIONS FOR U09A1 [DOCX]. USE THE ASSIGNMENT TEMPLATE FOR U09A1 [DOCX] TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:
Provide a compelling narrative of the organizational issue, including next steps for further action and investigation.
Describe the people and stakeholders who are involved in the organizational issue and your research—they are the story’s characters. Note: Use pseudonyms and be sure to alter or omit any identifying details of your site.
Who is most or least impacted? Who has the most to gain? To lose?
Who are the power brokers? Who are the influencers? Who is empowered to make decisions? Who is aligned with whom?
How does one negotiate change processes with these groups?
What are the major resisters or relationship, social, or political barriers to change with regard to your issue?
What have you learned through your interviews? Were people’s responses to your interview questions surprising?
Reflect on the process of your research.
Provide exhibits of existing information and quantitative and qualitative data, and subsequent data gathered and analyzed.
Ensure your story or case is data-driven and guided by factual information.
Present your case as a work of nonfiction, presented in an engaging manner, informed and supported by the existing data, literature you have examined, and data you have collected.
Include quotes from your interviews and draw on your memos or journal entries.
Include support you have gleaned from the literature.
Include appendices or exhibits that contain:
Your interview questions.
Your interview data analysis, including your transcripts, coding notes, and markings.
Your tables and charts of quantitative data.
Identify unanswered questions or questions that have arisen as a result of your data collection.
Use PIE—Proof, Information, Examples—to support your assertions.
Weave the findings of your analysis of existing and collected data into the narrative as you describe the situation, including representative quotes from your qualitative data, the literature, and the site’s existing qualitative or quantitative data.
Summarize how this narrative-creating activity has influenced understanding of the problem or issue.
What seems to be the problem?
What are the systems components of the issue?
What assumptions do people make about the problem? (When information is incomplete—as it almost always is—people make assumptions to fill in the gaps.)
What has been accomplished in addressing this issue thus far?
What institutional barriers to change exist with regard to this issue?
Summarize how ethical considerations (bias elimination, data security, conflict of interest) related to data gathering, analysis, and storytelling were handled.
You are also involved in the story. As Merriam and Tisdell note, “The researcher is the primary instrument for data collection and analysis” (Merriam & Tisdell, 2015, p. 16).
As an investigator who wants to be aware of any bias and potential conflicts of interest that may lead to erroneous insights, you have been maintaining a journal or writing memos about your observations and reflections. Show how your discussion of the problem is informed by your data and the literature.
Provide a conclusion that indicates the nature of continuous improvement that could result from this project.
Present the dilemma and suggest potential courses of action.
Develop and compare at least two feasible courses of action that might be taken as next steps to address the issue.
Evaluate the pros and cons of each suggested course of action.
Invite your reader to provide feedback, input, or suggestions. What would your reader do under the circumstances you have described?
Address all components of the assignment prompt, using the assignment description to structure text.
Organize the chronology of your story clearly, making sure you provide context and background at the beginning of the case so the reader can follow along.
Provide context before introducing story elements.
Use the cases you have read as a guide and provide rich detail that will help create a compelling and complete case.
Note: For assistance in finding scholarly sources using the Capella library databases, please consult the EdD Program Library Research Guide or Library Help.
Additional Requirements
In addition to the requirements outlined above, your assignment should meet the following:
Written communication: Written communication should be scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of professional contexts. Write your paper in the third person.
APA format: Follow current APA style and format, including a cover page, headings, and a hanging indent for all citation entries. Review APA information from the Writing Center and Evidence and APA.
References: Minimum 6 scholarly sources using the Capella library databases to find peer-reviewed articles. You may also use your course texts, if needed, to go toward your minimum source number. Support your claims, statements, assertions, and arguments in the paper using PIE—Proof, Information, Examples—from these scholarly sources.
Length: 10–15 pages plus the title page, references, appendices or exhibits.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 points.
SCORING GUIDE
Your work will be evaluated using this criteria.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 2: Make valid inferences from information, evidence, and data.
SUMMARIZE HOW THIS NARRATIVE-CREATING ACTIVITY HAS INFLUENCED UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROBLEM OR ISSUE.
Competency 3: Frame a problem of practice supported by evidence.
Provide exhibits of existing information and quantitative and qualitative data, and subsequent data gathered and analyzed.
Competency 4: Evaluate potential interventions or solutions to a problem of practice.
Provide a compelling narrative of the organizational issue, including next steps for further action and investigation.
Provide a conclusion that indicates the nature of continuous improvement that could result from this project.
Competency 5: Apply ethical considerations to research.
Summarize how ethical considerations (bias elimination, data security, conflict of interest) related to data gathering, analysis, and storytelling were handled.
Competency 6: Construct a contextualized story of an inquiry cycle to effectively communicate to an intended audience.
Address all components of the assignment prompt, using the assignment description to structure text.
Competency 7: Apply scholarly writing skills.
Strayer Organizational Issue Story Research Paper
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
