Rogers Seven Stage Model of Change Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Rogers Seven Stage Model of Change Discussion
After reading chapters 6 & 7 of the attachment, please answer the following discussion questions in 8-12 sentences:
What do you think of Roger’s seven-stage model of change? What strengths and limitations does this model have? How might this model be utilized in cross-cultural counseling situations?
In addition to answering the discussion question, please respond to the two following peer posts in 3-5 sentences:
Roger’s seven stage model of change is a great way to observe where one’s client is at in the therapeutic process and take note of their progress. I appreciate that it’s a growth model and gives hope for the future, rather than just presuming that a person perceives the world through one single lens, it gives hope that one’s entire perception of themselves and their world can develop through the stages and come to a place of awareness and ownership of self. One of the limitations I perceive is that it is a very general and idealized way of conceptualizing the therapeutic process.
Each individual experiences therapy differently, comes to therapy with different concerns, and can terminate therapy whenever they feel they have accomplished what they needed, regardless of whether or not they have reached the seventh stage. The actual application of the seven stages needs to be personalized for each client and understood through their own individualized lens. Another one of limitations I perceive is the lack of consideration for cultural differences. For example, certain cultures do not appreciate or condone the full expression of one’s emotions.
The higher stages of “expressions and feelings” which indicate flowing emotional expression, may be stages that certain cultures are not comfortable ever getting to, however the same individual may be the higher stages in other areas such as the “perception of problems” which includes more cognitive elements rather than emotional. I think each area and stage needs to be understood and conceptualized through the culture and personal experiences of each individual.
- The seven stage model sounds like rapport. The counselor has successfully established. relationship with the client that enable the client to go from being hesitant and reserved to open and honest. I think the expectation that the client should be open from the beginning of therapy because they made the chose to come to therapy is an ideal situation and perhaps this happens often. The seven stage model sounds like description of what anyone who is new to therapy experiences. My experience was bit different. I walked in and laid it all out and was like how do we fix this, don’t tell me im right because I am wrong on some things, give me what you got. I don’t know if that is a therapist worst nightmare or ideal situation but that depends on the type of therapist you get. The strengths of this model is perhaps that it describes a large majority of people who come to therapy. The limitation of this model is expecting the client to be this way. It can be rigid and therefore make the interaction with the counselor almost inauthentic. I think that this model perhaps describes how people within the black, asian, and latin culture respond to therapy. Given the stigmas surrounding therapy in these communities, reading it felt familiar to how people in my culture react to strangers. Is this the foundation of human interaction/friendships? In some cultures, specifically black, you have to be trusted before we can share with you. We have to feel that you can understand where we are coming from in order to get more information out as the model suggest. Unfortunately, the moment that the counselor does not, you may very well lose the client. In order for it to be effective the counselor must understand the culture of the client-the do’s and don’ts, when to push those boundaries, and when to lay off. This may sound and be way off base without explanation, but the way the voice in my head sees it is you have to know how to play the game when no games are being played.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.