Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Presentation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Presentation
Presentation: Analyzes an existing workplace quality improvement initiative related to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of
Instructions: Quality Improvement Initiative EvaluationDeliver to the interprofessional team a presentation (20 minutes; 12-15 slides) that analyzes
an existing workplace quality improvement initiative related to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of interest. The presentation’s
purpose is to inform and get buy-in from the interprofessional team.IntroductionToo often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and
outcome measures take place in isolation—various groups talking among themselves about results and enhancements. As a result, they must
develop their skills in reviewing and evaluating performance reports. They also need to be able to communicate outcome measures related to
quality initiatives effectively. Patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes mandate collaboration among nursing staff members
to ensure the integration of their perspectives in all quality care initiatives.In this assessment, you will have the opportunity to analyze a quality
improvement initiative in your workplace. You will then present your analysis to a group of nurses and other health care professionals. The
purpose of your presentation is to inform and enlist support for the initiative from your audience.PreparationQuality Initiative SelectionIn this
assessment you will deliver an analysis of an ongoing quality improvement initiative in your workplace. The initiative you analyze must relate to a
specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. The purpose of your analysis is to assess whether
specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Your audience
consists of nurses and selected health care professionals with specializations or interest in your selected condition, disease, or issue. You hope to
inform and garner support for the initiative from your audience.Recording Your PresentationTo prepare to record a voice-over for your
presentation:Set up and test your microphone or headset using the installation instructions provided by the manufacturer. You only need to use
the headset if your audio is not clear and high quality when captured by the microphone.Practice using the equipment to ensure the audio quality
is sufficient.Consult Using Kaltura for guidance on how to record your presentation and upload it in the courseroom.Microsoft PowerPoint also
allows you to record your narration with your slides. If you choose this option, simply submit your presentation to the appropriate area of the
courseroom. Your narration will be included with your slides.Remember to practice delivering and recording your presentation multiple times to
ensure effective delivery.InstructionsThe optional QI Initiative Evaluation Presentation Template [PPTX] is provided to help you prepare your slides.
If you choose to work without the template, consider referring to Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX].In your presentation,
you will:Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives.Explain
the rationale behind the QI improvement initiative. What prompted the initiative?Detail problems that were not addressed and any issues that
arose from the initiative.Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks.Analyze the
benchmarks used to evaluate success. Which aspects of the initiative were most successful? What outcome measures are missing or could be
added?Incorporate one appropriate supporting visual (such as a graph or chart) that showcases the most critical aspect of this
presentation.Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes.Integrate the perspectives of
interprofessional team members involved in the initiative. Who did you talk to? What are their professions? How did their perspectives impact your
analysis?Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative.Identify specific process or
protocol changes as well as technologies that would improve quality outcomes.Ensure slides are easy to read and error free. Provide detailed
speaker notes. Also ensure audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant
and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).Additional RequirementsPresentation length: A maximum of 20 minutes.Number of slides:
12-15 slides. Balance text and visuals. Avoid text-heavy slides. Use speaker’s notes for additional content.Font and font size: Appropriate size and
weight for presentation, generally 24-28 point for headings; no smaller than 18 point for bullet-point text. Use a suitable professional typeface such
as Times or Arial throughout the presentation.Number of references: Cite a minimum of seven current scholarly and/or authoritative sources to
support your analysis. Current is defined as no older than 5 years unless a seminal work.APA formatting: Adhere to APA style and formatting
guidelines for citations and references. Consult these resources for an APA refresher:Evidence and APA.APA Module.American Psychological
Association. (n.d.). Competencies MeasuredBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following
course competencies and scoring guide criteria:Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data
surveillance.Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative.Competency 3:
Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health
care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives.Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative according
to recognized national benchmarks.Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost
effectiveness, and work life quality.Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes.Competency 5: Apply
effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed
speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant
and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).
Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Presentation
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.