Public Health Information Value Estimator Project
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Public Health Information Value Estimator Project
A public health information value estimator has step methods that are used in assessing security threats and the risk value of organizational public health information (Kolstad, 2012). It estimates the overall data breach cost potential and provides a method for establishing a level of investment needed to add strength to security programs and reduction of the probability in which a breach can occur.
Did the organization handle address its PHIve risk in its five steps well?
The organization handles addressing its protected health value estimator risk in its steps well. This is was through assessing risks that are involved, vulnerabilities plus the safeguard that are applicable for every protected health information home. The protected health information home refers to the functional, administrative, and technical database that is used to create, store, maintain and transmit public health information.
The organization has identified many public health information homes and their security readiness that needs a cross-functional explanation within the organization. These will help in identifying policy, process issues, and gaps in the security that will promote awareness of the public health information issues.
Secondly is the score on their security readiness through establishing the similarity of a data breach. The score is fundamental, for it allows one to assess the level of that can be with an organizational general security posture. A scale of 1 to 5 is usually used as a weighted measure of security readiness based on the probability of a data breach. 1 to 2 is the acceptable score, whereas 4 to 5 is the unacceptable score.
Through determining relevance for each public health information that had a security readiness score that is unaccepted, there is an examination conducted of a particular category of cost a relevance structure applied from the hierarchy that is provided. The breach costs are broken into five categories, including financial, reputational, operational, clinical, and regulatory. In this, not all costs will be relevant to the public health information home.
All the public health information home whose security readiness score is unaccepted is given a relevance factor that will be linked with the probability of cost being incurred in case a data breach occurred in the public health information home
The organization determines the potential repercussions, consequences, and relevance. The consequences are then determined using various aspects of a potential breach that is based on a variety of considerations for the organization (Tiplady,2018). The repercussions may include financial, reputational communication, change to insurance, and changing associates. Lastly is the sum of the total impact by adding all the adjusted costs of the organization.
Additional step for the company
Adding the changed costs to project the financial implications of a data breach. This is done through the addition of all the cost that costs that are adjustable for all the public health information homes whose security score is unacceptable to evaluate a total cost that can be adjusted. The adjusted total is then calculated as a revenue percentage that is used to evaluate the critical level of a data breach.
Kolstad, J. T. (2012). undefined. The Value of Information, 143-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4839-2_6
Lepper, M. D., Scholten, H. J., & Stern, R. M. (2007). undefined. Springer Science & Business Media.
Tiplady, P. (2018). undefined. Vision and Value in Health Information, 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315375380-11
Public Health Information Value Estimator Project
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.