- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaybasket.com
Neuroprosthetics for spinal cord injury patients
Neuroprosthetics for spinal cord injury patients
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Neuroprosthetics for spinal cord injury patients
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition that results in partial or complete paralysis and loss of sensory functions below the level of injury. In recent years, advancements in neuroprosthetics have provided a new avenue for treating spinal cord injury patients. Neuroprosthetics are devices that interface with the nervous system to restore lost sensory or motor function.
Neuroprosthetics can be broadly classified into two types: peripheral and central. Peripheral neuroprosthetics interface with the nerves and muscles outside the central nervous system (CNS), whereas central neuroprosthetics interface with the CNS. In the context of spinal cord injury, central neuroprosthetics are of particular interest, as they aim to restore lost function by bypassing the injury site and directly stimulating the CNS.
One of the most promising approaches in central neuroprosthetics for spinal cord injury is epidural electrical stimulation (EES). EES involves implanting electrodes in the epidural space over the spinal cord, which are then used to stimulate the spinal cord directly. This stimulation can be used to facilitate the generation of motor commands or sensory information, depending on the location of the electrodes.
In recent years, EES has been used to restore function in patients with spinal cord injury. For example, a study conducted at the University of Louisville demonstrated that EES can be used to restore voluntary movement in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. The study involved implanting an EES system in four patients with complete paralysis below the level of injury. After six months of training with the system, all four patients were able to perform voluntary movements of the legs, including standing, stepping, and even some overground walking with the assistance of a walker.
Another approach to central neuroprosthetics for spinal cord injury is brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). BCIs allow individuals to control external devices using their thoughts. In the context of spinal cord injury, BCIs can be used to control robotic limbs or other assistive devices, allowing individuals to perform tasks they would otherwise be unable to do. For example, a study conducted at the University of Pittsburgh demonstrated that a BCI could be used to control a robotic arm in a person with tetraplegia.
Peripheral neuroprosthetics are also being developed to restore function in spinal cord injury patients. For example, functional electrical stimulation (FES) involves using electrical stimulation to activate the muscles of the limbs, allowing individuals to perform movements they would otherwise be unable to do. FES can be used to restore function in both upper and lower limb muscles, and can be used for a variety of tasks, such as grasping objects, standing up, or even walking.
However, there are still some challenges to the widespread use of neuroprosthetics for spinal cord injury patients. One major challenge is the cost of these devices. Implantable neuroprosthetics are often expensive, and many insurance companies do not cover the cost of these devices. Additionally, the long-term effects of these devices are still not fully understood, and there is a risk of complications such as infections or electrode migration.
Another challenge is the limited functionality of some of these devices. While EES and FES can restore some motor function, they are not a complete cure for spinal cord injury. Additionally, the use of neuroprosthetics requires significant training and rehabilitation, which can be time-consuming and costly.
Despite these challenges, the development of neuroprosthetics for spinal cord injury patients represents a significant advancement in the field of rehabilitation medicine. As technology continues to improve, it is likely that these devices will become more widely available and more effective in restoring function to individuals with spinal cord injury.
Neuroprosthetics for spinal cord injury patients
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
