National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
Making decisions within an organizational context require a strong assessment of the possible effect the decision is likely to have. Different leaders employ different leadership strategies which they presume to be essential in meeting their organizational success. National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
Thus, it is imperative to understand key needs and traits that are likely to have an influence on organizational development. The behaviour that a leader exhibit has a direct influence on the level of commitment among their followers. National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
As assessed in this case, each candidate maintains a positive basis within which it is possible to build change while shaping the underlying relationship that develops with their colleagues. Charley’s dominant needs and motives involve being liked and supported by co-workers. Everyone wants to work in a friendly environment where they are loved and appreciated (Umpstead et al., 2015).
A strong relationship within a given context involves building change while seeking to maintain a solid basis for improved performance. Charley believes that building positive relationships within the workplace is integral to his success and improving organizational performance. Leaders are expected to be shining light in their organizations as well as their employees. Leaders are expected to foster a relationship where employees strive to replicate the attributes and values maintained by their respective leaders. National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
Bill is a loner and maintains a different basis which offers a more enhanced basis where it is easier to improve efficiency and change. His key motives and needs include that he likes to work alone rather than focus on building relationships. He wants to save the most complex work for himself, which is a unique trait he does not enjoy. National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
He is ambitious and loves challenges (Weber, 2013). Further, he dislikes authority in politics. It is imperative to effectively create an enhanced environment where it is possible to ensure that he remains highly motivated and builds a robust working environment. National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
Ray Johnson’s dominant motive is narcissism. His motivation has created a strong basis where he maintains a strong foundation for improved change and performance, which has influenced his commitment to acquiring power that offers a vital context for change and enhanced level performance. National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
He loves luxurious life, and he maintains a focus on solid self-esteem and a low level of integrity, which are characteristics of narcist leaders.
The influence of these traits on the success of each candidate
The candidates that have been identified in this case maintain a vital context where it is possible to help shape organizational development and their ability to improve efficiency and level of commitment. Personal values define individual needs and wellbeing, which offers a more strategic and specific understanding of common concepts while also representing a solid operational context.
Personal values and principles are embedded in emotional awareness, providing a pervasive commitment to individual character. Charley’s traits have positively influenced his promise to meet organizational success while maintaining an improved basis for change and development.
Despite being a loner, Bill’s commitment to success and putting in place measures that promote his success level maintain a broader basis for change and improved level commitment.
Personal awareness and the need to maintain a solid, productive focus on the environment have been vital in helping improve change and allow focus on values that can help advance personal morality and wellbeing. Achieving a higher level of personal development is influenced by the interaction and changes that occur and build emotional wellbeing and self-efficacy (Klus & Müller, 2021).
It is fundamental to maintain a broader context that can be adopted in redefining change while also helping build a strong structure that improves efficiency and transformation.
Ray maintains an authoritarian personality that will negatively influence his followers since the work environment requires a high level of diversity and flexibility to help keep a more enhanced basis for improved performance and success. It is essential to achieve a high level of success and maintain a positive foundation for change and performance level. National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
Should Thomas recommend any of these candidates? National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
I believe that Charley embodies what they are looking for and is likely to create a highly dynamic workforce that works together to achieve the intended level of success. It is crucial to maintain a strong basis where it would be easier to attain quality outcomes. It is integral to create a unique context where diverse processes improve efficiency, help outline change, and improve performance. National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
Metro Bank Case
What leadership behaviors did Brown use to change the branch office and motivate employees? National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
Employees want to work in an environment where they are appreciated rather than under constant pressure. Brown came in when the branch was experiencing low productivity and morale, which are essential components in boosting organizational performance. Brown cultivated a friendly environment where all employees felt a necessary and critical part of the organization.
This was essential in boosting their morale and performance (Brinkmann et al., 2021). Brown created development opportunities for all, which was fundamental in meeting the needs of employees who had remained stagnant with no progress. Further, a unique organization vision.
Brown’s Vision of the Bank
Brown was very strategic and specific regarding the processes and vision she sought to develop within her mandate. She focused on ensuring that vision revolved around the needs of her employees with the objectives of the executive development program to ensure that there is an improved service delivery platform (Aguilar, 2017).
This was essential in creating a robust operational basis where it was possible to improve change and maintain a high level of specificity regarding employee performance and needs. The vision involved focus on needs and quality service delivery which is integral to change and organizational success.
Brown leadership style
I believe that Brown meets the criteria for both transformational and charismatic leaders. The basis for performance, in this case, involves maintaining a high level of success while building change that seeks to improve the needs of her followers.
She maintains close interaction with her employees while striving to strengthen their commitment to organizational requirements. It is vital to shaping organizational change while maintaining a proper level of success that offers an improved performance level. She empowers her followers and ensures that they have the essential nature of expertise.
Therefore, it is essential to effectively understand the underlying business decisions which promote change and level of organization operation. Maintaining a focus on the traits and behaviour of a leader illustrate the commitment for improved performance and focus on organizational success.
It is imperative to help create a solid basis for enhanced adaptation and performance. Forming relationships ensure that there is a high-level commitment within an organization.
Aguilar, A. (2017). Showing empathy, building leaders. Modern Healthcare.
Brinkmann, J. L., Cash, C., & Price, T. (2021). Crisis leadership and coaching: a tool for building school leaders’ self-efficacy through self-awareness and reflection. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-01-2021-0009
Klus, M. F., & Müller, J. (2021). The digital leader: what one needs to master today’s organisational challenges. Journal of Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-021-01040-1
Umpstead, R., Hoffman, H., & Pehrsson, D.-E. (2015). Building Leadership from Within the Ranks: Leadership Fellow Initiative. Advancing Women in Leadership.
Weber, D. K. (2013). You Can Do It! A Practical Approach to Building a Strong Perinatal Leadership Team. JOGNN – Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/1552-6909.12140
National Products and Metro Bank Case Study Project
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.