ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
Learning Goal: I’m working on a business case study and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
Refine the product backlog for the project and select the user stories to include in sprint 2 (2 points)
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
Note: An item not completed in Sprint 1 must be returned to the Product Backlog, “re-sized”, and prioritized so that the item may be considered for inclusion in Sprint 2.
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
Because an item was not completed in Sprint 1 does not mean that it must or should be included in Sprint 2. If an item that was not completed in Sprint 1 is included in Sprint 2, the item tasks that had a status of “done” from Sprint 1 must not be included in the Sprint 2 Backlog.
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
Create the sprint 2 backlog based on the decisions made in #1. Explain the changes. (2 points)
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
Assume day 1 of sprint 2 is complete; create both a Task Board and Burndown chart for sprint 2. (4 points)
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
Make a recommendation regarding whether to release the product at the end of sprint 2 and what next steps should be for the project team after the completion of sprint 2. (2 points)
Case Study
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
Wisconsin weather has become surprisingly unpredictable and volatile in the last few years. In the past year alone, some areas of Wisconsin had experienced unusually heavy rainfall (resulting in severe flooding), life-threatening wind-chill temperatures, heavy snowfalls, high winds and other extreme weather. During these times, often local business – including restaurants – would close.
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
This made it difficult for company workers to find places to order lunch during the day. Local inhabitants and some off-campus college students also found themselves facing a lack of food or shopping options. Particularly for these types of residents, transportation in inclement weather could be an issue, since many walked or biked to their destinations.
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
During a particularly long stretch of dangerous wind chill weather, a group of young entrepreneurs attending a workshop wanted to go out for lunch. After walking to two restaurants that were close by (in -35-degree wind chill weather!), they returned to the workshop without lunch because both restaurants were closed due to the weather.
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
Irritable and hungry, the group members thought of the idea to have a local resource available to help people find businesses that would be open during extreme weather emergencies. They quickly formed a small startup company and Scrum team to create an online system for this purpose. Their vision was for this online system to initially provide information only to attract site visitors and awareness, which would ultimately lead to potential revenue to be generated through ads, business sign ups, and other marketing and promotional services.
Product Backlog
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
After evaluating the weather reports for the upcoming month, then looking back over the past two years, the team decided it would be worthwhile to produce such a system.ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
They agreed to identify the initial priorities for the system based on the local college population (living off campus, without meal plans) and downtown area (young professionals living in the area and/or at work), since those potential customers were most likely to eat out often and to be looking for last minute dining options during inclement weather.
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
The Product Owner (PO) came up with the following Product Backlog for the project. After meeting with the ScrumMaster (SM) and Development Team (DT) members, the project team decided that this system could be fully developed within 2 month
3 attachments
ITSCM770 Product Backlog Functional System Prototype case study
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.