Inequality and Unprofessionalism in Healthcare Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Inequality and Unprofessionalism in Healthcare Discussion
Cha’s (2020) article discusses a case where a person’s disability is view as poor quality of life. In the article, Mr. Hickson’s continuation of treatment is futile related to his disability. The decision on the treatment being futile often
occurs in the healthcare field. This decision leads healthcare professionals to question what is more important, quality of pain-free life or saving the life?
Although, it is important to consider the patient’s choices and receive consent to the plan of care. By not receiving informed consent from the patient ethical principles and the framework for decision-making were not applied
correctly. Inequality and Unprofessionalism in Healthcare Discussion
Mr. Hickson’s rights to autonomy were taken away by not allowing him to make his own decisions in his care. The patient was not allowed to provide informed consent on the route of his care. It also seems that the family lack
education on the patient’s diagnosis that contributed to his treatment plan.
The failure of beneficence was seen by not promoting Mr. Hickson’s welfare such as the physician not treating the diagnosis any longer. The ethics of nonmaleficence was not performed by not continuing treatments which
eventually led to the passing of Mr. Hickson’s death. In Mr. Hickson’s case, justice failed him due to the misconception that disability equals a poor quality of life. A disabled person holds the same right as a young adult and can
live a quality life.
Askitopoulou & Vgontzas (2018), indicates principles from the oath demonstrate humanistic and moral values. The physician in Mr. Hickson’s care violated the oath of “no harm” (Askitopoulou & Vgontzas, 2018). The oath is
violated by moving the patient from an ICU unit to hospice care which may lead to death a lot sooner. Although, the act committed by the physician is justified. The healthcare professional acts are justified, by the oath of
providing protection from long-term pain, which is inevitable in intubation due to the increased risk of aspiration, vocal paralysis, and enduring long-term pain. Askitopoulou & Vgontzas’s literature states that the Hippocratic Oath
encompasses commitment such as “the physician to respect the dignity of the patient and his family”. Mr. Hickson and his wife’s dignity are not preserved and respected due to the approach of the situation to inform the family
of the treatment route. Inequality and Unprofessionalism in Healthcare Discussion
Medical futility increases moral dilemmas among healthcare professionals. Although, it is highly important to treat everyone fairly and with respect when providing care. In this case, nonmaleficence could have been provided by
keeping the patient and wife up to date with the diagnosis and ensuring they understood the information being provided to them to ease them and help them become involved in his care. Inequality and Unprofessionalism in
Askitopoulou, H., & Vgontzas, A. N. (2018). The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times. European Spine Journal:
official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 27(7), 1481–1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5348-4
Askitopoulou, H., & Vgontzas, A. N. (2018). The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part II: Interpretation of the Hippocratic Oath—today’s perspective. European Spine
Journal, 27(7), 1491–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5615-z
Cha, A. E. (2020, July 6). Quadriplegic man’s death from covid-19 spotlights questions of disability, race and family. The Washington Post. Retrieved August 29, 2022,
Shapiro, J. (2020, July 31). One man’s covid-19 death raises the worst fears of many people with disabilities. NPR. Retrieved August 29, 2022, from https://www.npr.org/2020/07/31/896882268/one-mans-…
STUDENT 2: Inequality and Unprofessionalism in Healthcare Discussion
While reading these articles and watching this video, I tried to keep an open mind. Many times, I caught myself saying “there’s no way the doctor did that” or “I don’t believe the nurse was that rude and just bluntly refused to help
their patient.” It was extremely hard to read the articles for this assignment and watch the video and not want to instantly defend my fellow nurses and medical staff. But as a mother, it was even harder to think, what if that was
my child? Is that what this case really is, just that of grieving parents? It is understandable that parents would grieve the loss of their child and feel the need to blame something or someone. And as a nurse, I know how difficult it
can be when every medical treatment has been exhausted but it does not change the outcome and the patient is still lost.
Based on the Schara family’s point of view, ethical principles such as beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and several others were disregarded. Was this truly due to Grace having down syndrome? Would the same actions have
taken place if she did not have a condition that altered her cognitive ability? In one article Mr. Schara stated that Grace was able to read and write. Is a person’s ability to read and write not typically used to determine their literacy
status? What was her cognitive status? Morally, it is hard to understand how any person, especially a doctor or a nurse, could so blatantly avoid helping another human being.
Based solely on the articles and video, which are from the Schara family’s point of view, I feel that the ethical and moral principles were violated. These articles show an inconsistency in Grace’s care as well as her right to justice
and autonomy. There also seemed to be inconsistencies in the information that was being provided to the family regarding her condition.
I do not doubt the reasoning for the Schara family’s beliefs nor do I not feel sympathy for their loss but I cannot help but wonder if Grace had died from any other illness besides Covid would the family still feel as though the
hospital and staff intentionally let her die?
‘it’s genocide’: Family alleges ominous conclusion in seeking answers to their daughter’s death. www.theepochtimes.com. (2022, June 27). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://www.theepochtimes.com/its-genocide-family-
Our amazing grace: News release – world wide genocide. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://www.ouramazinggrace.net/NewsReleases/NewsR…
Scott Schara: Pfizer Drugs & Medical Malpractice killed his daughter Grace. UncoverDC. (2022, February 16). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://uncoverdc.com/2022/02/15/scott-schara-pfiz…
Inequality and Unprofessionalism in Healthcare Discussion
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.