- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaybasket.com
Identity and Attribution in Intercultural Communication
Identity and Attribution in Intercultural Communication
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Identity and Attribution in Intercultural Communication
Who are we? An evolving sense of identity is changing the socio- political scene, writes Clarence Tsui
Of course, it’s not as if there weren’t efforts to galvanise a “Hong Kong spirit” before that – who could forget the government’s ill-fated “Hong Kong for Sure” campaign in 1999 to secure the hosting rights to the 2006 Asian Games, or former financial secretary Antony Leung Kam-chung’s cringe-worthy rendition of Below the Lion Rock in his budget speech in March 2002 to conjure public sympathy for his initiatives?
The most glaring example was in April 1999, when the then Secretary for Security Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee declared that up to 1.67 million mainlanders would come to Hong Kong if a court ruling giving right of abode to mainland-born children of Hong Kong residents was not overturned. Branded by human rights activists as a “scare tactic”, Mrs Ip’s remarks inadvertently shaped mainlanders as a marauding mass hovering at the gates.
The transformation of mainland arrivals to Hong Kong in the past two years – from poor cousins to moneyed tourists – reveals the conflicting sentiments Hongkongers have in terms of how they see the “other” and themselves.
“On the one hand we want to earn their money, but on the other we still want to see them as backward people who couldn’t compare to our sophisticated selves,” says Sze Lai- shan, a social worker with the Society for Community Organisation who has worked since 1996 for the rights of mainland immigrants. And in this lies the schism within the Hongkonger: an identity that remains in flux, whether Queen’s Pier remains or not.
Having appeared at the forefront of ill-fated campaigns to save Queen’s Pier and Wan Chai’s Wedding Card Street – not to mention the fame he attained four years ago as the youngest-ever candidate in district council elections – Chan King-fai is a veteran in fielding media questions these days. However polished as he might be, he recalls one particular question that really annoyed him a month ago.
“It was this television journalist who was interviewing me for, well, one of those handover anniversaries specials,” he said. “And after all the deliberate questions, he said he had one final question he had to ask me: whether I feel I’m Chinese now. So after all the discussion that went on about our work, it boils down, again, to such a simplified view of things.”
It’s easy to see the source of his ire: for someone who fronts a group called Local Action – comprising activists whose major objective is to salvage Hong Kong’s heritage from the relentless claws of urban renewal – the old chestnut of taking sides on the Sino-British divide is akin to a swipe at his efforts in cultivate an organic cultural identity for Hong Kong.
“It’s always been such a rigid framework – either you choose to be an Anglophile, or you consider yourself Chinese. But it’s so ridiculous: it’s like when somebody said to me that since I admired Queen’s Pier so much, I must have feelings for the colonial era, and not for China,” Mr Chan said.
Fellow Local Action activist, Chow Sze-chung, agreed, saying: “When we talk about Queen’s Pier, it’s not just about British monarchs having landed here. What we wanted to remember is how more than 30 local social movements had begun and happened right here.”
Their view embodies a popular sentiment that bubbled among intellectuals before the handover on July 1, 1997, and has soared to the forefront in the past few years: that beneath all the focus of Hong Kong as an incidental success story that resulted from the political manoeuvres between two political powers, there’s also a Hong Kong story to be written. In this story a Hong Kong-specific cultural identity – an indigenous mix of the city’s history, from its social upheavals and heritage to its popular culture – plays a central role.
And it’s a mass social movement which basically propelled Mr Chan, his fellow activists and probably even more of the city’s residents in acknowledging that there is a society out there and not just a co-existence of cynical, get-rich-quick individuals. Hackneyed this might sound, but the demonstration on July 1, 2003, instilled into many a Hongkonger a communal spirit and local consciousness that had been more or less ambivalent, or even absent, in the past.
Of course, it’s not as if there weren’t efforts to galvanise a “Hong Kong spirit” before that – who could forget the government’s ill-fated “Hong Kong for Sure” campaign in 1999 to secure the hosting rights to the 2006 Asian Games, or former financial secretary Antony Leung Kam-chung’s cringe-worthy rendition of Below the Lion Rock in his budget speech in March 2002 to conjure public sympathy for his initiatives?
The swathes of people who filled Victoria Park, Hennessy Road and then Queensway en route to the Central Government Offices four years ago, generated a spirit of a different kind: that being a Hongkonger does not engender merely nostalgia and sentimentality, but also a base for social action.
“The July 1 marches were certainly a watershed for the development of a cultural identity for Hongkongers as for the first time the participants saw themselves in a subjective role,” said Eric Ma Kit-wai, an associate professor in journalism and communication at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
He saw something new to the construction of a new Hong Kong-specific identity this time, compared with similar events decades ago, whether it be the movement for the legitimisation of the Chinese language or the birth of indigenous Canto-pop in the late 1970s.
“Back then, the advocacy of local culture was more rooted in things like popular culture, for example,” he said. “Now, the mass media have helped in refracting the energy of the mass movements into a higher political realm, with the evolution of a local consciousness producing public initiatives about government policy, such as in conservation.”
Having conducted surveys on local and national identities in Hong Kong since 1996, Professor Ma admitted he had imagined a decade ago that Hongkongers would have a “more ambiguous and diluted” affiliation with their local identity as the years rolled by. “It was certainly true during the first few years, as people tried to come to terms with their position [in the Chinese social framework],” he said.
And the numbers did tally up to that effect. In the polls he conducted with colleague Anthony Fung Ying-him, people who identified themselves only as Hongkongers dropped from 25.2 per cent in 1996 to 21.5 per cent in 2006; meanwhile, nearly 60 per cent claimed a mixed Hong Kong-Chinese identity last year, compared to just 47 per cent in 1996.
Beyond the opinion polls lies a different story, Professor Ma said, with advocacy groups for local culture going from strength to strength – as shown by the vocal antagonism against reclamation, the removal of Queen’s Pier and the government’s forced postponement of the West Kowloon Cultural District, a project which ran into strident opposition from a united front of artists, politicians and grass-roots activists.
Collective strength is nearly always born out of harsh circumstances – and Hong Kong has certainly been a hotbed for the nurturing of its own cultural identity, given the economic and social winters the city has battled through in the past decade.
The sharp recession brought about by the Asian economic crisis in 1998, for example, gave rise to an officially orchestrated campaign to pull ourselves together – products of which include the “Hong Kong for Sure” project, and the Flying Dragon logo that was meant to be a confidence-booster for a city in dire straits.
Then there were former chief executive Tung Chee-hwa’s ever- changing attempts to position Hong Kong: a competitor against London and New York one year, an aspiring major Chinese city the next. And finally, there was the Sars outbreak. As Hong Kong plunged further into desolation and misery, popular culture – under the aegis of a government desperate to deflate public antipathy – produced relics such as 1:99, a collection of 12 short films from Hong Kong directors (each of which received government subsidies of HK$500,000) with the common theme of raising post-Sars public morale.
Many might question whether such an aspiration for a Hong Kong- specific cultural identity has anything to do with the handover at all. Certainly, the circumstances which drew the local population together in pursuit of a common lineage of collective memory might not seem directly linked to the change of guards on July 1, 1997. But the transfer of sovereignty has spawned many of the situations which forced people to vocalise their concerns en masse.
The most explicit example, of course, is the July 1 demonstration, spurred by discontent towards the flawed decisions made by a Tung administration. The Sars epidemic, meanwhile, could be partly blamed on ramshackle communications between Hong Kong and the mainland.
Not that the traditional mainland-Hong Kong chasm has disappeared altogether, however. The differentiation which shaped how Hongkongers saw themselves in the 1980s – with television series and films separating the civilised, affluent “us” from the uncouth, impoverished “them” across the Lo Wu River – has remained, and it is something that both the government and the general population have used for their own ends.
The most glaring example was in April 1999, when the then Secretary for Security Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee declared that up to 1.67 million mainlanders would come to Hong Kong if a court ruling giving right of abode to mainland-born children of Hong Kong residents was not overturned. Branded by human rights activists as a “scare tactic”, Mrs Ip’s remarks inadvertently shaped mainlanders as a marauding mass hovering at the gates.
The transformation of mainland arrivals to Hong Kong in the past two years – from poor cousins to moneyed tourists – reveals the conflicting sentiments Hongkongers have in terms of how they see the “other” and themselves.
“On the one hand we want to earn their money, but on the other we still want to see them as backward people who couldn’t compare to our sophisticated selves,” says Sze Lai- shan, a social worker with the Society for Community Organisation who has worked since 1996 for the rights of mainland immigrants. And in this lies the schism within the Hongkonger: an identity that remains in flux, whether Queen’s Pier remains or not.
Identity and Attribution in Intercultural Communication
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
