Health and Medical Question
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
1.5 – 2 pages double spaced. APA format. please discuss each point separately.
You oversee compliance with workplace safety and health laws for Rossetti Industries, a corporation that produces bacteria for use in laboratory experiments. Rossetti Industries owns and operates a laboratory in Idaho.
Five weeks ago, a worker at the Idaho laboratory, Jason Barrows, accidentally knocked over a beaker containing fluid located on a pedestal near a doorway in the laboratory. The beaker had no insignia, but other workers informed him that fluid within the beaker contained potentially dangerous bacteria. Mr. Barrows complained to his supervisor that he was not informed that the beaker was hazardous and that its placement made it prone to being knocked over.
The supervisor dithered, unsure how to proceed. The fluid within the beaker at issue contained the bacteria Acetivibrio-Beta, a bacterium strain recently developed by Rossetti Industries that did not exist in nature. He was unaware of what hazard, if any, the bacteria posed to humans or whether it fell within the ambit of 29 CFR 1910.1030, concerning bloodborne pathogens. He also was reticent to move the beaker at issue because that spot received the most sunlight of any in the laboratory, which greatly aided the reproduction of the algae the bacteria used as a food supply. Relocating the beaker, therefore, would require some production processes to be reconfigured. Moreover, though the beaker was located near a door, in the supervisors opinion, the doorway was not obstructed.
Mr. Barrows, unsatisfied at the supervisors response to his concerns, requested that OSHA investigate the laboratory. During the investigation, he accompanied the OSHA inspectors around the premises and pointed out the safety hazards he perceived. As he was doing so, he maintained a loud and disrespectful diatribe against his supervisor, claiming in disparaging fashion that, if the supervisor was competent, he would know the toxicology of all the bacteria at the lab. Several coworkers overheard Mr. Barrowss comments and reported them to the supervisor. The following day, the supervisor confronted Mr. Barrows. When Mr. Barrows repeated his insulting comments, the supervisor terminated him ostensibly on grounds of insubordination. OSHA eventually cited Rossetti Industries because (A) the beaker constituted a hazard and Rossetti Industries did not take the requisite precautions with it; and (B) the beakers placement illegally obstructed the doorway.
How could the supervisor (or someone else at Rossetti Industries) have resolved his questions about the toxicity of the bacterium at issue and the propriety of the placement of the beaker and pedestal, both of which are questions unlikely to have been raised by any other party? Discuss the process by which one could obtain OSHAs answers to these questions.
Suppose the supervisor obtained an OSHA opinion letter indicating that (A) the bacterium at issue was not a hazard under 29 CFR 1910.1030 or any other OSHA standard; and (B) the placement of the beaker and pedestal was permissible. What effect, if any, would the issuance of this opinion letter have on the outcome of the OSHA investigation of the premises described in the fact pattern?
Suppose Mr. Barrows alleges that he was terminated in retaliation for lodging his complaint with OSHA.
· Detail the steps OSHA will take in investigating this complaint and making an assessment of its validity.
· How do you think OSHA will rule on this complaint?
Suppose that, prior to the OSHA investigation of the premises, the supervisor had ordered laboratory worker Ray Pierce to move the beaker to a location far from any doorway. Suppose also that Mr. Pierce neglected to do so before the OSHA investigation. How do you think these facts would have affected the OSHA investigation here?
Requirements: 1.5- 2 pages
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.