Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

Table of Contents

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

Nursing Questions

REQUIREMENTS

Draft a proposal for your data review project. Use the Data Review Project Proposal Template, linked in the Resources of this unit.

Integrate faculty feedback on your proposal, prior to sharing it with the prospective client.

Supporting Evidence

Add a minimum of five relevant, authoritative sources, cited within the outline, different than the original citations from Assessment 1. Limit commercial website references to no more than two entries. Format your citations and references using APA style. Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your proposal addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Data Review Project Proposal Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed. Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

Choose a framework appropriate for examining the type of data under investigation. Look at the following for examples and explain the basis for your choice.

For a compliance project, use the regulations. Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

For an accrediting assessment, use the standards and site survey criteria.

For the implementation of a new service line, consider using the balanced scorecard framework.

Explain how a project addresses and adds value to each of the four areas of an organizational balanced scorecard. (The four areas being, business operations, finance, customer service, and organizational learning and growth.) Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

Create a balanced scorecard table similar to the one presented in the Balanced Scorecard Example, linked in the Resources of this unit.

Consider a strategic, systems perspective as you contemplate value to the organization and how the project aligns with the organizational mission, vision, and strategy.

Find evidence to support your assertions and conclusions. Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

Determine what additional information would strengthen your value proposition. Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

Develop proposed structures (for example, pie chart, graph, spreadsheet, process map) for the visual display of summarized raw data. Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

Reflect on what type of visual display structure will best fit your selected topic. Although you are just beginning to collect data, you will want to consider how to display it.

Ensure that your data displays are clear and easily interpreted. Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

Ensure that the proposed title includes the focus of the data, units of measurement, the organization’s name, and time frame.

Combine clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature.

Apply correct APA formatting to your source citations.

Consider how or why a particular piece of evidence supports your main points, claims, or conclusions.

Make sure your supporting evidence is clear and explicit.

Data Review Project Proposal Template

Your data review project proposal should include the following elements: Cover Page: Include the project topic, the course title, your name, the date, and the instructor’s name.Table of Contents: Headings and sub-

headings with right-justified page numbers.Executive Summary: One page, double-spaced. Include the topic, the problem, the purpose of the project or data examination, the method to examine the data (data review),

and the nature of the findings (for example, quality improvement of X).Introduction: Four-sentence topic description—statement of the problem, the performance indicators to be evaluated, the outcome measures for

each indicator, and the value proposition or relevance statement.· I am examining [state the issue or problem], because [identify the relevant and authoritative reference that validates your issue as a problem].· I will

examine [state the type of data], and will assess the data by measuring [state the performance indicators and outcome measures].· This project will add value to [state the type of organization or name] by [mention

how it aligns with an organizational need].· This project aligns with my professional interests and career goals by [mention how it adds value or has relevance for you personally].Statement of the Problem: State the

issue in the form of a problem, and add a properly-formatted APA citation.Background: Literature: Provide a minimum of six authoritative sources. Add a short description of each source explaining how the content

directly relates to the topic. Note: Wikipedia and commercial websites are not authoritative sources.Your sources should address the following:· The issue from a national or industry level.· Current, relevant facts,

trends, and emerging issues.· The issue relative to your subsector of the health care industry or continuum of care.· Data and statistics that substantiate the need to examine the issue (or, what are the consequences

and risks of not addressing the issue?).Client Value Proposition:· State how your project will address or add value to each of the four areas of the balanced scorecard: business operations, finance, customer service,

and organizational learning and growth.· Restate any pertinent information, including an industry macro overview, such as a new policy to be implemented, compliance with an existing regulation or law, and client

needs and situation.· Make a precise statement about how the data review will add value to the organization.· Include a request for input and feedback from the practicing health care professional or selected health

care organization. This is to ensure that your identification of key performance indicators and targeted data sets under investigation align with the needs of the organization.Expected Outcomes and Precise

Performance Measurement:· What data will be collected and analyzed?· Explain how each performance indicator that relates to the problem will be measured. Be precise in explaining how the outcome will be

measured.· Explain what type of visual displays you will use to summarize or group the data you are examining (for example, a pie chart, graph, spreadsheet, and process map.)Leadership Component:· Describe your

precise roles and responsibilities in leading the effort. Human subject research is outside the scope of the Health Administration Capstone course.· Select one NCHL competency within each category or domain of

People, Transformation, and Execution. Then, provide a short explanation about how each relates to your project. For example, Domain = People; Competency = Change Leadership. I will practice this competency in

Unit 4 by seeking feedback and suggestions from a practicing health care professional.Timeline: Include a week-by-week summary of major tasks to be done to complete the project.· Proposed start and end dates,

weekly to-do tasks, responsible party (learner), and due dates. Note: Use the Project Management Timetable format.

Balanced Scorecard Example

Framework Appropriate for Examining the Type Of Data

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.