Forensic Biometrics in Signature Recognition
| Order ID | 53563633773 |
| Type | Essay |
| Writer Level | Masters |
| Style | APA |
| Sources/References | 4 |
| Perfect Number of Pages to Order | 5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Forensic Biometrics in Signature Recognition
A signature is a handwritten mark that is used to signify the approval or verification of a document. It is a form of biometrics, which is a unique identifier that can be used to verify a person’s identity. Signatures are often used in legal and financial transactions, as they provide a way to ensure that the document has been signed by the intended person.
Forensic biometrics is the application of biometrics to the field of forensics. It is used to identify individuals who have been involved in crimes or other legal matters. In the case of signatures, forensic biometrics can be used to determine whether a signature is genuine or forged.
How Forensic Biometrics Works
Forensic biometrics uses a variety of techniques to analyze signatures. These techniques can be divided into two main categories: static and dynamic. Static techniques analyze the physical characteristics of a signature, such as the size, shape, and slant of the letters. Dynamic techniques analyze the way in which a signature is created, such as the speed, pressure, and pen movement.
By analyzing these characteristics, forensic biometrics can create a unique signature profile for each individual. This profile can then be used to compare signatures and determine whether they were created by the same person.
Advantages of Forensic Biometrics in Signature Recognition
There are several advantages to using forensic biometrics in signature recognition. First, it is a very accurate method of identification. Signature profiles are very unique, and even small changes in the way a signature is created can be detected. This makes forensic biometrics very effective in detecting forgeries.
Second, forensic biometrics is a non-intrusive method of identification. Unlike other biometric methods, such as fingerprints or facial recognition, signatures can be collected without touching the individual. This makes it a more acceptable method of identification for many people.
Third, forensic biometrics is a relatively inexpensive method of identification. The equipment needed to collect and analyze signatures is relatively inexpensive, and the software used to create signature profiles is also relatively affordable. This makes it a viable option for businesses and organizations of all sizes.
Limitations of Forensic Biometrics in Signature Recognition
There are some limitations to using forensic biometrics in signature recognition. First, signatures can be easily forged. Forgers can learn to copy the physical characteristics of a signature, or they can use technology to create a fake signature. This makes it important to collect multiple signatures from each individual, and to compare them carefully to determine whether they are genuine.
Second, signatures can change over time. As people age, their signatures may become larger or smaller, or they may change the way they write certain letters. This can make it difficult to match signatures that were created at different times.
Third, signatures can be affected by external factors. For example, if someone is signing a document in a hurry, their signature may be less consistent. Similarly, if someone is signing a document while they are sick or injured, their signature may also be different.
Conclusion
Forensic biometrics is a valuable tool for identifying individuals and detecting forgeries. However, it is important to be aware of the limitations of this technology. By collecting multiple signatures from each individual and comparing them carefully, it is possible to reduce the risk of false positives and false negatives.
In addition, it is important to use forensic biometrics in conjunction with other security measures, such as passwords and encryption. By using a layered approach to security, it is possible to create a more robust system that is less susceptible to attack.
Forensic Biometrics in Signature Recognition
RUBRIC | QUALITY OF RESPONSE | NO RESPONSE | POOR / UNSATISFACTORY | SATISFACTORY | GOOD | EXCELLENT | | Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) | Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. | 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. | 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. | 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. | 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. | | Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). | Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. | 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. | 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. | 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. | 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. | | Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) | Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. | 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors | 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors | 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. | 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. | | Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) | Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. | 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. | 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper | 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. | 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
 GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow |
| Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|  |
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
