Evaluating Logistic Efficiency Discussion Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Evaluating Logistic Efficiency Discussion Paper
Please respond to the following discussion post as a peer making a comment. There are various tools that a healthcare organization can use to increase their logistic efficiency like root cause analysis, six Sigma, lean management, and managing your key performance indicators.
RCA is a strategic problem-solving technique that allows you to examine a problem and implement a process to solve that problem to keep it from reoccurring again. This tool can improve patient safety and improve the quality of care, leading to better logistical efficiency.
Six Sigma is a strategy hospital management uses to analyze a specific process and analyze the data from your performance tools to implement better outcomes. Six Sigma processes can help reduce waste, improve profits and gains, employee morale, and quality of products and services. (Al-Qatawneh et al., 2019).
Lean management tools help an organization create maximum value by reducing waste. This method can change an organization’s way of thinking and value and ultimately changes the behavior and culture over time. (Lawal et al., 2014).
Finally, keep and monitor your key performance indicators to be managed and put different processes in place to improve these indicators like inpatient engagement scores, utilization rates, readmission rates, and overall improve the quality of care given at your organization.
Measuring the capacity or throughput of various resources like x-ray equipment and exam rooms can give the organization the value of volumes that can equal the revenue brought in per day. An organization can get an overall view of the average revenue volume that each room or x-ray equipment they can produce per year.
By looking at the capacity of a machine and ER volumes, you can also regulate your staff’s productivity per day, which could control staffing costs. Healthcare performance measurements allow leaders to reduce costs and improve the quality and efficiency of care that they deliver.
In addition, capacity utilization helps the administration make well-educated decisions on their facility’s capital budget and staffing matrix. Knowing the value of volumes put out by a piece of imaging equipment can give the administration the knowledge to see the return on the investment that they are getting.
For example, having low-capacity utilization levels can indicate that resources may be over or under-allocated. The resource can be supply cost and staffing. Having an overall view of the capacity utilization for your industry can help leaders make better-educated decisions regarding ordering and long-term utilization strategies.
Al-Qatawneh, L., Abdallah, A. A. A., & Zalloum, S. S. Z. (2019). Six Sigma Application in Healthcare Logistics: A Framework and A Case Study. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2019, 9691568. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9691568
Capacity Utilization—Manufacturing KPI Examples. (n.d.). Sisense. Retrieved March 8, 2022, from https://www.sisense.com/kpi-library/manufacturing-kpis/capacity-utilization/
Donovan, M. (n.d.). Performance Measurement: Connecting Strategy, Operations, and Actions. Retrieved March 1, 2022, from https://www.reliableplant.com/Read/140/performance-measurement
Healthcare Performance Measurements | Healthcare Outcome Measures | IBM. (n.d.). Retrieved March 1, 2022, from https://www.ibm.com/topics/healthcare-performance-measurements
Hughes, R. G. (2008). Tools and Strategies for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety. In R. G. Hughes (Ed.), Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2682/
Lawal, A. K., Rotter, T., Kinsman, L., Sari, N., Harrison, L., Jeffery, C., Kutz, M., Khan, M. F., & Flynn, R. (2014). Lean management in health care: Definition, concepts, methodology, and effects reported (systematic review protocol). Systematic Reviews, 3, 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-103
What is Root Cause Analysis (RCA)? | ASQ. (n.d.). Retrieved February 24, 2022, from https://asq.org/quality-resources/root-cause-analysis
Evaluating Logistic Efficiency Discussion Paper
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.