- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaybasket.com
Ethical Issues Discussion Essay Assignment
Ethical Issues Discussion Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Ethical Issues Discussion Essay Assignment
Sources:12
Subject: Other
Topic: Ethical Issues
Paper details:
This assignment is in 2 parts: both parts are submitted together. Choose any 2 of these 4: 1. Discuss the following statement: “There are no objective moral facts. Therefore there is no single, objectively valid and universally binding set of moral principles” (750 words) 2. Give a brief account of the main points of utilitarianism. Explain with reference to one or two examples, some of the difficulties with this ethical theory and explain your own reactions to this ethical theory as a basis for making moral decisions. (750 words) 3. Give a brief account of the main points of deontology (or Kantian ethics). Explain with reference to one or two examples, some of the difficulties with this ethical theory and explain your own reactions to this ethical theory as a basis for making moral decisions. (750 words) 4. Give a brief account of the main points of virtue ethics. Explain with reference to one or two examples, some of the difficulties with this ethical theory and explain n your own reactions to this ethical theory as a basis for making moral decisions. (750 words) Your degree assessment front cover must accompany every piece of assessment submitted (you only need 1 cover sheet for this assignment). Please also add the marking sheet as the last page in the document Work should be word processed using Arial font size 12 and double (or 1.5) line spacing. Work should have page numbers and each page should have student identification number. Your name should not appear on any page of the work. Word count should be included on your degree assessment front cover. All work must be referenced using Harvard style of referencing as shown in the UHI Referencing Guidelines. Please see the UHI referencing guide at: https://www.uhi.ac.uk/en/t4-media/one-web/university/library/how-to/UHI-SRG-2014-ENGFINAL.pdf SEE FAQs on next page Frequently Asked Questions: • Do I answer all 4 questions? NO – answer any 2 – you choose. • Do I submit them as 1 single file Yes please: the file will be: 1. Front cover 2. Paper 1 Title 3. Paper 1 4. Reference list 5. Paper 2 Title 6. Paper 2 7. Reference list 8. Marking sheet. • Do I have to write an Introduction? A brief one: For example: This paper considers the main points of the normative ethical theory of utilitarianism. That is a perfectly acceptable opening. Then just get on with it. • Word count is a bit low? It is. Which is why I don’t want a long and winding Introduction paragraph. It should also encourage you to write as concisely and economically as you can. Don’t waste words – check and re-check… are you” bloating” out your assignment with clumsy writing? • Can we go 10% under or over the wordcount? You can go over by 10%. Going under is risky and would suggest you haven’t made the best use of the wordcount and might indicate a rather weak attempt. But see also my point about “bloating” in your writing. Make every word count. • So, can we use bullet points? No – write the essay in continuous prose in paragraphs. You can use headings if you want; remember they count towards the word count. • Can we use appendices? Not if you’re trying to circumvent the word count. In fact, there really shouldn’t be any need to use appendices in an assignment like this • How many references do you want us to have? There is no set number required. For such a brief paper, 3 or more is common, and acceptable. That doesn’t mean you’d be penalized if you only gave 1 or 2. Can you open this link? its important you to read that please. https://www.uhi.ac.uk/en/t4-media/one-web/university/library/how-to/UHI-SRG-2014-ENGFINAL.pdf About evidences you can see what they are telling us You can choose for me what you prefer to write this link i have to listen for this essay… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiJnCQuPiuo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBdfcR-8hEY i upload some files i had study about … so its files 5 Kantianism http://justiceharvard.org/#watch http://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/deontology-kant-duty-and-moral-law http://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/deontology-kant-duty-and-moral-law https://brightspace.uhi.ac.uk/content/enforced/232526-UL3097322021/22/csfiles/home_dir/Learning%20resources/Week%207-%208%20Kantianism%20Marianne%20Talbot%20-%20Audio/talbot-ethics-05.mp3?_&d2lSessionVal=2KpLz3085XgTHlA1LWv76NQIN&ou=232526 virtue_theory_explained.pdf An excellent piece of reading on virtue ethics – if you only read one of these, please make it this one: http://www.iep.utm.edu/v/virtue.htm These links also provide very accessible introductions/overviews http://www.rsrevision.com/Alevel/ethics/virtue_ethics/index.htm http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/ http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/TEth/TEthCafa.htm and from the excellent Hinman… http://ethics.sandiego.edu/theories/Aristotle/index.asp Marianne Talbot on virtue ethics – an excellent exposition. http://www.mariannetalbot.co.uk/podcasts/a-romp-through-ethics-for-complete-beginners/3-virtue-ethics-virtue-values-and-character/ This is a further lecture from Sandel, perhaps less helpful than Talbot’s, but excellent nevertheless http://www.justiceharvard.org/2011/02/episode-10/#watch
SHOW LESS
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
