- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaybasket.com
Ethical and Societal Issues from Technology Use Case Study
Ethical and Societal Issues from Technology Use Case Study
Table of Contents
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Ethical and Societal Issues from Technology Use Case Study
For our final paper, please compose a 5-6-page (double-spaced) term paper.
This paper should be well-written, well-organized, and carefully thought-out.
Final papers will be due during finals week by end of day Thursday December 17th (11:59 pm).
Before getting started, please take some time to take stock of our course materials as a whole. Consider each of the materials covered throughout our sixteen weeks together. Have any particular readings, documentaries, or
topics/themes grabbed your attention more than others? Did you find one or more of our week’s course materials particularly relevant to, or helpful in making better sense of, historical or current issues relating to STEM? On the
other hand, were there any concerns or arguments in course materials that you felt ‘missed the mark’ or perhaps provided a framework or piece of evidence that you would like to take the opportunity to critique in light of other
course materials?
Having critically reviewed each week’s ideas, please select a distinct reading/set of readings, and/or clip/documentary from our course and develop a 5-6-page (double-spaced) essay that aims to either 1.) develop an argument
that expands on and/or critiques the material(s) selected by way of comparison/contrast with a second course reading/viewing OR 2.) apply the course material(s) to a particular historical or contemporary topic or question
concerning ideas, values, and/or practices relating to STEM.
In other words, please compose either a compare/contrast/critical assessment essay, OR an essay applying course materials to a particular issue or question relating to STEM. Please note: our final is not meant to serve as an
extended outside research paper; rather, our goal is to consider the strengths and limitations of particular frameworks and ideas presented in our course either theoretically in a compare/contrast fashion OR empirically by way of
their application/relevance to historical or ongoing concerns in STEM.
Examples. If one was intrigued by the epistemological debates between traditional and social constructionist analyses, two options might present themselves: one might choose to further elaborate the implications, strengths,
and limitations of the contrasting approaches to the study of knowledge, OR one might like to pick up the arguments developed in one or more of the particular schools of thought (functionalism, the Strong Programme, feminist
standpoint theory, etc.) and elaborate on the significance of that school of thought in the context of debates about the U.S. response to COVID-19.
Perhaps you were intrigued by our discussions concerning the role of race or gender in STEM – how they are or are not biologically determined and/or socially constructed, or perhaps how these social identities and experiences
matter to the ideas and practices embedded in particular STEM fields, interpretations, or applications. One could choose one or a few specific course materials to expand upon, highlighting what you see to be their real or
potential strengths and limitations as descriptions or explanations with regard to the roles of race or gender.
Or, one might use a particular reading/viewing from class as a theoretical lens through which to discuss the significance of genetic testing.
Perhaps some of our course materials can be used to better illuminate aspects of the discussions swirling around questions of scientific funding and its connection to objectivity.
Do any of our course materials provide particularly poignant insights into the positive or negative role of standardization and formal vs. tacit knowledge production?
How might course materials speak to issues of expertise and decision making in medical settings? What positive or negative consequences might result from taking a positivist or relativist position vis-à-vis questions of
expertise? Ethical and Societal Issues from Technology Use Case Study
Are there important STEM ‘black boxes’ still in need of substantial unpacking and further analysis?
What about the ethical considerations (and potential conflicts of ethics) relating to various technological objects and their applications?
Is there any hope for Pluto being a planet??? (I kid!!)
It is also suitable to craft a final paper that ‘goes big’ insofar as it aims to address the ‘big picture’ questions of our course – what possibilities do or could exist for expanding or reimagining our STEM knowledges and practices
for the greater good? What obstacles to better conceptualizations or applications in STEM have we covered and what, if any, alternative approaches do our course materials explicitly lay out or implicitly gesture towards? Do you
agree? Disagree?
The STEM sky is the limit here!
Important: Whether folks choose to embark on a more theoretically-based elaboration/compare/contrast-style essay or to develop a more empirically-grounded application of course materials to past or ongoing concerns or
puzzles in STEM, please be sure to include direct textual evidence in support of any central claims made in the final paper. Insofar as technical terminology is necessary, please be sure to briefly explain what theoretical or
methodological concepts mean. While these papers are necessarily motivated by individual interests and concerns, please be sure to fully explain the arguments and significance of the materials under consideration prior to
elaborating on one’s personal position/assessment of said materials. Some subjective interpretation and assessment are most welcome; however, final papers should not mirror impassioned letters to the editor! In other words,
please be sure to establish the main positions and reasonings behind the materials chosen before extending, critiquing, or applying them. Ethical and Societal Issues from Technology Use Case Study
While a final exam constitutes a serious component to any class, please use the opportunity to explore a topic or question from any course material that really excites, puzzles, or otherwise intrigues you – make this your own
original project and have fun with it!
Ethical and Societal Issues from Technology Use Case Study
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Ethical and Societal Issues from Technology Use Case Study
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
