DSM-5 Couple and Family Counseling Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
DSM-5 Couple and Family Counseling Discussion
Discussion: Couple and Family Counseling and the DSM-5
Though the philosophy and values surrounding couple and family counseling emphasize prevention and wellness, awareness of diagnosis is important when interacting with other mental health professionals who may view mental health issues through the medical model. The DSM-5, the primary diagnostic system/manual used in the United States by such professionals, identifies and describes individual mental health disorders, not relational issues or disorders.
Those mental health professionals who adopt a systems or relational view of mental health have been able to implement small changes within the DSM in its subsequent editions, and these changes acknowledge the systemic influence on certain individual disorders. Nevertheless, there is not yet an adopted diagnostic structure for relational problems. Therefore, you may sometimes need to negotiate your relational perspective with other professionals and communicate client matters with insurance reimbursement boards (who see mental health problems as individual in nature) in their language.
For this Discussion, you will examine the DSM-5 and how it informs your professional practice. You also explore the advantages and disadvantages of being familiar with the DSM-5. https://web-p-ebscohost-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=b1e54335-1d10-4384-b5b3-00b1f9c7f5c0%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=90535709&db=a9h
BY DAY 4
Post an example of a specific instance in which you may need to consult with another mental health professional who utilizes the DSM-5. Then, explain how your familiarity with the DSM-5 may influence this consultation. Next, explain one advantage and one disadvantage of a couple and family practitioner being familiar with the DSM-5. Be specific.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the resources.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.
BY DAY 6
Respond to two of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:
Ask a probing question.
Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
Offer and support an opinion.
Make a suggestion.
Expand on your colleague’s posting.
Colleague 1: TomekaAn example of a specific instance in which you may need to consult with another mental health professional who utilizes the DSM-5. DSM-V is, “, the diagnostic guide to mental disorders of the American Psychiatric Association” (Lebow, 2013, p. 155). A specific instance in which I may need to consult with another mental health professional who utilizes the DSM-5 is if an individual meets the criteria for several different DSM-5 diagnoses. As a future social worker, I would not want to misdiagnose an individual.
Misdiagnosing a client could lead to their condition/symptoms getting worse. Also, clients will try diagnosing themselves or others if we don’t diagnose them (Strong and Busch, 2013). ADHD, depression, and bipolar disorder are three disorders with the highest mental health misdiagnosis statistics in children and adolescents (Hillside, 2019). Then, explain how your familiarity with the DSM-5 may influence this consultation. By being familiar with DSM-5, I can effectively help clients and communicate with peers in regards to the clients. It is important for workers to diagnosis clients correctly, so it is okay to contact the mental health professional for a second opinion.
This will ensure that the client I am assisting is diagnosed properly based on the symptoms mostly shown. This will also push me to gain more understanding when it comes to a certain diagnosis. As it states in the NASW Code of Ethics, under ethical principles, “Social workers continually strive to increase their professional knowledge and skills and to apply them in practice” (2017). Next, explain one advantage and one disadvantage of a couple and family practitioner being familiar with the DSM-5. Be specific.
One advantage of a couple and family practitioner being familiar with the DSM-5 is they will accurately diagnosis the client and decrease the chances of misdiagnosing the client. Under the diagnosis in the DSM-V are the symptoms. Practitioners can compare the client’s symptoms to the symptoms listed. For example, if you think the client has Anxiety Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition Diagnostic Criteria 293.84 (F06.4), you could look at the symptoms below to determine. “A. Panic attacks or anxiety is predominant in the clinical picture. B. There is evidence from the history, physical examination, or laboratory findings that the disturbance is the direct pathophysiological consequence of another medical condition. C. The disturbance is not better explained by another mental disorder.
- The disturbance does not occur exclusively during the course of a delirium. E. The disturbance causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning” (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Last quarter, students and I were given case studies where we had to diagnosis clients. Having the symptoms listed in the DSM-V allowed students and me to rule out the possible diagnoses. When it comes to a disadvantage, “Reaction has been intense as advocates claim advances in the scientific basis of classification, while critics castigate the extension of what they regard as an artifice that has little to do with the realities of experiencing and coping with human problems” (Lebow, 2013, p 155). The clinician may even misdiagnose a client without paying close attention to their situation. American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS FIFTH EDITION DSM-5. Washington, DCLebow, J. L. (2013). Editorial: DSM-V and Family Therapy. Family Process, 52(2), 155–160. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1111/famp.12035NASW – National Association of Social Workers. (2017). Retrieved, from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English.Strong, T., & Busch, R. (2013). DSM-5 and Evidence-Based Family Therapy? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 34(2), 90–103. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1002/anzf.1009
Colleague 2: Khalil Post an example of a specific instance in which you may need to consult with another mental health professional who utilizes the DSM-5A specific instance where I may need to consult with another mental health professional would be when my client’s symptoms are decompensating. For instance, I meet with this client weekly and have noticed that they are not making progress towards their goals. They may report or engage in symptoms of psychosis during our session. In this case, I would contact the psychiatric nurse practitioner to gather information from his/her medication evaluation with this client.
The practitioner can then inform me on the client’s prescription, self-reports of medication management, and any additional symptoms that the practitioner may have observed during their appointment with my client. With this information, I can include psychoeducation into our weekly sessions to further educate my client on their symptoms and how it has impacted their well-being (Larner, Strong & Busch, 2013).
Then, explain how your familiarity with the DSM-5 may influence this consultation. The DSM-5 is a mental disorder diagnosis manual that includes symptoms and its impact on other areas of an individual’s life. For instance, a disorder may hinder an individual’s social life, success on the job or in school to name a few. With this knowledge, I would need to know what medications my client is taking and if there have been any changes with their medications that can contribute to their presenting problems. Next, explain one advantage and one disadvantage of a couple and family practitioner being familiar with the DSM-5. Be specific.
One advantage of a couple and family practitioner being familiar with the DSM-5 would be their knowledge of symptoms and its severity. Also, they will be able to assist the client in identifying how their diagnosis impacts other areas of their life, as mentioned above (Larner, Strong & Busch, 2013). This knowledge may encourage a client who is not medication compliant to consider taking medication to reduce their problems. For example, a client may not be able to maintain a job because of their psychosis. He/she may experience auditory hallucinations while working that hinders their job performance and is eventually fired. My knowledge of the DSM-5 can further explain their diagnosis and symptoms and encourage them to take medication to reduce their symptoms and be able to perform on their job. One disadvantage of a couple and family practitioner being familiar with the DSM-5 would be mislabeling.
The practitioner may label their client incorrectly based on their symptoms that they experience. Mislabeling can negatively affect the assistance that the professional provides to their client. It can cause the therapist to develop and implement a treatment plan that does not address the presenting problem (Lebow, 2013). References Larner, G., Strong, T., & Busch, R. (2013). Family Therapy and the Spectre of DSM-5. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 34(2), 87–89. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1002/anzf.101Lebow, J. L. (2013). Editorial: DSM-V and Family Therapy. Family Process, 52(2), 155–160. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1111/fam…
DSM-5 Couple and Family Counseling Discussion
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
DSM-5 Couple and Family Counseling Discussion
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.