Diversity Audit Course Project Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Diversity Audit Course Project Assignment
For the Course Project, each student is to select an organization and perform a diversity audit. You will then prepare a paper outlining your research and results.
Review the detailed information contained in the textbook Harvey Case #50, Evaluating Diversity Management: Conducting a Diversity Audit, pages 376–382, for preliminary information to assist you.
As you progress through the project, you’ll want to use the process flow diagram given below as a guide.
Determine Audit Methods
Select Audit Criteria
Write Description of Diversity Initiatives
Write Final Report
Write Executive Summary
Press the ESC key to close the image description and return to lecture.
There are graded deliverables due in Weeks 2 and 3 as outlined below, and the final Course Project is due in Week 7.
Papers should be 8- to 12-typed pages, not including references, cover sheets, table of contents, appendices, and so forth.
To be considered complete, papers must include a title page, table of contents, executive summary, appropriate appendices, and reference list (APA format). Substantial points will be deducted for failure to include all of these items. See the grading rubric below.
Week 2: Course Project Proposal Due
This week, you should be working on Steps 1 and 2of the project (See the process flowchart in the Course Project section under Course Home.).
Identify the organization you selected for the Course Project. Instructor approval is required. Be prepared to provide the following information (in bulleted format) regarding your selection.
Describe the industry of the selected organization.
Explain why you selected this organization.
Discuss what steps you will need to take to complete the diversity audit (What interviews will you conduct? What other steps will you take? etc.). What steps will you need to take to complete the audit? What secondary research will you need to evaluate? This might include company websites, annual reports, news articles, and so forth. What primary research will you conduct? This would include personal interviews (can be conducted in person or over the phone). You might choose to utilize a questionnaire or survey.
Week 3: Diversity Audit Criteria Due
This week, you should be working on Step 3 of the project. Identify the criteria that you will use for the audit. These criteria will become the benchmarks that you will later use for evaluating the organization’s diversity initiatives. The criteria must be based on research, not just your opinions. You might also think of the criteria as a list of best practices.
Weeks 4–6: Conduct Audit
Complete Steps 4 through 7 in the process flowchart. This involves actually conducting the audit (gathering your secondary research and conducting the primary research). Then write a description of the organization’s diversity initiatives. The information you need to write this portion of the project is the secondary and primary research that you have completed. Evaluate the organization’s diversity initiatives. This is not an evaluation based on your own opinions. It is an evaluation against the audit criteria (best practices) that you have identified earlier.
Then write your recommendations. The recommendations should flow logically from the description and evaluation of the organization’s diversity initiatives.
Week 7: Diversity Audit Paper Due
The Course Project is due at the end of this week. If you have kept up with the project as outlined for Weeks 1–6, then you have already written the first draft of the report. Use this week to edit the final report, and add the title page, table of contents, list of references, and any appendices.
Write the Executive Summary. This should be no more than two pages. It should include a description of the organization and summarize the audit criteria, audit methods, description of organization’s diversity initiatives, your evaluation, and recommendations.
Category Points % Description Executive Summary 10 5% Summarize your paper in such a way that readers can rapidly become acquainted with your paper without having to read it all. It will usually contain a brief statement of the problem or proposal covered in the major document(s), background information, concise analysis, and main conclusions. Organization Background 10 5% Briefly provide information about the selected organization’s background (history, size, culture, industry, organization, etc.). Audit Methods 30 15% Explain the criteria you have selected for a diverse organization. Detail how and why you came up with the selected criteria. Note that you will want to conduct outside research for more information. It is recommended to use the Keller Online Library. Describe your audit methods and the organizational visits. Description of the Organization’s Diversity Initiatives 40 20% Describe the organization’s current status and efforts in terms of diversity management. Evaluation of the Organization’s Diversity Initiatives 50 25% Evaluate the effectiveness of the organization’s diversity initiatives against your established criteria for a diverse organization. What is working? What needs improvement? Recommendations 40 20% Outline your specific recommendations for improvement. Fully justify your recommendations, and indicate the business reasons for the changes you are recommending. Spelling and Grammar, APA Form and Style, Required Components: Title Page, Table of Contents, List of References 20 10% Points will be deducted for the omission of any required components of the paper, for poor grammar, spelling, or writing style, and for failure to cite sources in proper APA format. Total 200 100 A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
The following are the best practices in preparing this paper.
Cover Page—Include who you prepared the paper for, who prepared it, and the date.
Table of Contents—List the main ideas and section of your paper and the pages in which they are located. The illustrations should be included separately.
Introduction—Use a header on your paper. This will indicate you are introducing your paper.
The following is the purpose of an introduction or opening.
Introduce the subject and why the subject is important.
Preview the main ideas and the order in which they will be covered.
Establish a tone of the document.
Include in the introduction a reason for the audience to read the paper. Also, include an overview of what you are going to cover in your paper and the importance of the material. (This should include or introduce the questions you are asked to answer on each assignment.)
Body of Your Report: Use a header titled with the name of your project. Example: The Development of Hotel X—A World Class Resort. Then proceed to break out the main ideas. State the main ideas, state major points in each idea, and provide evidence. Break out each main idea you will use in the body of your paper. Show some type of division, such as separate sections that are labeled, separate group of paragraphs, or headers. You would include the information you found during your research and investigation.
Summary and Conclusion: Summarizing is similar to paraphrasing but presents the gist of the material in fewer words than the original. An effective summary identifies the main ideas and major support points from the body of your report. Minor details are left out. Summarize the benefits of the ideas and how they affect the tourism industry.
Work Cited: Use the citation format as specified in the Syllabus.
Additional hints on preparing the best possible project.
Apply a three-step process of writing: Plan, write, and complete.
Prepare an outline of your research paper before you go forward.
Complete a first draft and then go back to edit, evaluate, and make any changes required.
Use visual communication to further clarify and support the written part of your report. You could use example graphs, diagrams, photographs, flowcharts, maps, drawings, animation, video clips, pictograms, tables, and Gantt charts.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.