CSCI 400 Ethics Law and Cybersecurity essay case study.
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
CSCI 400 Ethics Law and Cybersecurity essay case study.
Chapter 6 – Quiz 6
Instructions: There are three (3) topic areas listed below that are designed to measure your knowledge
level specific to learning outcome (LO 6) shown in your course syllabus. You must respond to #1 and
select any other one of these topic areas providing appropriate responses in essay form. In most cases
the topic area has several components. Each must be addressed to properly satisfy requirements.
State-wide and in most professional industries, there has been a mandate that college students be more
proficient in their writing. While this is not a writing class, all writing assignments will be graded for
grammar, syntax and typographical correctness to help address this mandate.
Pay attention to what you are being asked to do (see Grading Rubric below). For example, to describe
does not mean to list, but to talk about or illustrate in more than two or three sentences, providing
appropriate arguments for your responses using theories discussed in our text. Be sure to address all
parts of the topic question as most have multiple parts. A verifiable current event (less than 4 years old)
relevant to at least one of the topics you respond to is a fundamental component of your quiz as well.
You cannot use information from the text book or any book/article by the author of the text book as a
current event. Make sure that your reference has a date of publication.
For each chapter quiz and final quiz, you are required to find and include at least one reference and
reference citation to a current event less than 4 years old (a reference with no date (n.d.) is not
acceptable) in answer to at least one question. This requires a reference citation in the text of your
answer and a reference at the end of the question to which the reference applies. You must include
some information obtained from the reference in your answer. The references must be found on the
internet and you must include a URL in your reference so that the reference can be verified.
on your quiz. Only the first two (2) questions with answers will be graded. Include your name in the
document filename. Your completed quiz must be uploaded into the appropriate eCollege Dropbox, no
later than 11:59pm on the due date. Do well.
Strong arguments can be given as to why encryption tools are needed to safeguard communications in
cyberspace, yet these tools can be used by terrorists and criminals to protect their communications in
cyberspace. (a) In the wake of September 11, can a case be made for not allowing ordinary users to
employ strong encryption tools in Internet communications? (b) Can we still claim to live in a free
society if plans for government interception of email communications, as provided for in the Homeland
Security Act (http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/hsa2002.pdf), are be
implemented? Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in
support of your responses. (comprehension)
In the discussion of Internet anonymity, some forms of anonymous behavior in cyberspace can have
profound ethical implications. Imagine that there is a very close political election involving two
candidates who are running for a seat in a state legislature. The weekend before citizens will cast their
votes, one candidate decides to defame his opponent by using an anonymous remailer service (which
strips away the original address of the sender of the email) to send a message of questionable truth to
an electronic distribution list of his opponent’s supporters. The information included in this email is so
defamatory that it may threaten the outcome of the election by influencing many undecided voters, as
well as the libeled candidate’s regular supports, to vote against her. (a) Does the “injured” candidate in
this instance have the right to demand that the identity of the person using the anonymous remailer
(who she suspects for good reasons to be her opponent in this election) be revealed? (b) Why or why
not? Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of
your responses. (comprehension)
Is the expression “ethical hacker” an oxymoron? (a) Do you agree that some individuals should be
allowed to be “certified” as hackers to work on behalf of industry or for the interest of other
organizations? (b) Do the kinds of activities permitted by certified hackers in the CEH program raise any
moral issues? Explain. Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical”
rationale in support of your responses.
Grading Rubric for Quizzes
Grading criterion Unit Points Total Points
Uploaded to correct Dropbox 2 2
Submitted on time 15 15
Your Last Name, first and middle initial with correct quiz number 5 5
(Example only: Lastname_FI_q1)
Rationally expressed opinions, experiences (personal or observed), 8
arguments and premises (where appropriate) to support responses
(Did not simply restate/summarize author/textbook
Clearly presented classical ethics theories relative to topic 8
Included ‘URL’ for appropriate verifiable current event 12 28
(i.e., example of topic being discussed WITH EXPLANATION)
NOTE: Must be less than 4 years old
Grammatically correct and appropriate tone 10
(Professional, non offensive language)
Typographically correct 10 20
Included full citations as needed 3
Used correct APA format 7 10
Addressed each item within selected topic area 20 20
Maximum grade 100 100
CSCI 400 Ethics Law and Cybersecurity essay case study.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.