- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaybasket.com
Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
Content Type
reply:
by Jose Lenfers
The U.S Business Judgment Rules (BJR) was put in place to help protect corporation’s boards of directors from ridiculous legel allegations about how their business is ran. However, this does not make it that you can run the shadiest business and still be fully protected by the BJR. Boards of directors are presumed to always act in good ways, meaning directors owe some care and loyalty to its shareholders.
If there is evidence that the board violates the rules of conduct of the BJR, courts wont even review or question its decision. Boards also have an obligation to always be informed and act on an informed basis.
Finally boards must put the interests of the corporation and its shareholders over the intersts of others. I completely agree that directors should not be liable for an honest mistake with a history of solely doing good things. There must be evidence that they are breaking rules and blatant bad faith in order for them to be penalized.
The United Kingdom’s BJR is the company law. They were the first country to draft modern corporation statutes and it is a bit similar to the one in the United States. Management of the corporation is also ran through a board of directors and it limits liability to their commercial creditors in case a business is unable to pay debt. The UK company law also states that it is mandatory to act in good faith of investors.
I would not change anything about the U.S BJR because i think it is extremely fair. If blatant bad faith is present, they should 100% be held liable. It is not an easy task running a business and requires that you make thousands of different decisions, even a person acting in perfect honest good faith can mess up sometimes and they should not be help liable for that one time.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/businessjudgm…
http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/United_Kingdom_…By Bryan Castillo
The U.S. Business Judgment Rule is based on helping protect a corporations head directory of any flippant legal allegations about how the business is ran. Directors making a business decision is what surrounds the topic. I agree with the fact, a corporate director will not be liable and accountable to the corporation for honest mistakes of bad business decisions. If there is evidence of bad faith then of course they should be penalized but if there isn’t a clear reason, I do not see the point of having them liable. Having a rational basis for the decision they made is one of the three requirements to apply the business judgment rule.
In Canada for example, the rules comply the same due to the fact that Canada courts have a similar approach towards U.S. laws.
They enforce the duty of care that respects the fact that directors and officers often have expertise that courts do not. Even though in Canada, the business judgment rule is not really a stand-alone rule as a illustration of how the director took care of the duty is presented. Considered decisions and reasonable have to be presented but they do not have to be perfect.
Again, the reason Canada has it’s similarities with U.S. is because they are counterparts with them.
I believe this is due to the fact U.S. has developed a law that is understandable enough and an appropriate degree of diligence is presented. I would not change anything about the U.S. rule due to the fact that if relevant facts are presented, why hold them liable? Business decisions come with risks and sometimes lead into critical situations but that is what holds companies together.
If the evidence shown is valid and the person has acted with good faith then that should be good enough to not hold them liable. “They are not insurers of business success” is what it states in the text and that is the most effective aspect of the rule, because leaving a decision based on a person’s knowledge can vary. Whatever results are presented are held accountable for the entire company for allowing a head officer to decide.
References
https://www.lerners.ca/lernx/business-judgment-rul…
Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
