BUS 206 SNHU Tort Law and Contract Law essay case study.

BUS 206 SNHU Tort Law and Contract Law essay case study.

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

BUS 206 SNHU Tort Law and Contract Law essay case study.

Listen Read Speaker web Reader: Listen

Competencies
In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competencies:

Apply relevant aspects of law to current business situations

Differentiate between matters of law and matters of ethics in business situations

Scenario
The Friendly Dawg is a retail pet supply store owned by Dave Dawgs.  Dave has worked in the store since

high school and took over running the store after his father died two years ago. Originally the store sold
only pet food and supplies, such as animal food, bird cages, water bowls, pet beds, and so forth. Upon

taking ownership, Dave added fish tanks with fish for sale. Recently he built a kennel and cages in a

former storage area in the rear of the store in order to sell live animals, such as snakes, birds, dogs, and

cats. Landlord Lou came by during renovations and asked what was going on. One of Dave’s employees

told Lou that The Friendly Dawg was expanding its inventory and needed the space. Landlord Lou told

the employee, “Very exciting! Good luck!”

A few weeks later, landlord Lou began receiving complaints from the neighboring tenant, the Sunshine

Yoga studio, that the noise from the dogs and parrots was very disruptive.

The signed lease between Dave Dawg’s deceased father and Lou describes the business as a pet supply

 

store only and does not mention selling live animals. The lease specifies a rent in the amount of $500 a

month. Sunshine Yoga does not have a written lease. The owner of Sunshine Yoga, Jasmine, met Lou one

night in a bar two years ago where he verbally offered to rent her the space for $300 a month. Jasmine

claims that landlord Lou told her that night that she could rent from him forever and that he would

never evict her.
Lou called Dave, asking him to quiet the animals. Dave said he would try, but the complaints from
Jasmine continued. Dave also demanded that Lou improve the air-conditioning system, claiming it was

too hot in the rear of the store for his animals and it was causing them to become agitated. Landlord Lou
refused, claiming that air-conditioning was not meant to cool that area and it was not his job as landlord

to take care of live animals.
Dave stopped paying his rent, claiming that he was not obligated to do so because Lou was breaching his

 

obligation under the lease to maintain the property in good repair. The next day, a dangerous snake

escaped through the air vents and slithered into the neighboring yoga studio, frightening Jasmine, the
owner, such that she had a heart attack.

After recovering, Jasmine stopped paying her rent, claiming that the premises were unsafe due to the

presence of wild animals. She also claimed that she has been very depressed and anxious as a result of

the ongoing situation. And she contends that she has lost clients because of the noise coming from The
Friendly Dawg.

The Friendly Dawg has been a good tenant, enjoys a strong customer base, and pays more in rent than

Sunshine Yoga. Sunshine Yoga has always been late with rent, and Jasmine constantly bothers Lou over

minor issues.
Directions
Write two short papers—one on contract law and one on tort law.

Contract Law

Evaluate the potential rights, claims, defenses, obligations, and remedies for each party from the
perspective of contract law. Determine whether landlord Lou has a right to evict either party. Use
reliable resources, such as the textbook and other course resources, to support your evaluation.
Specifically, include the following components in your evaluation:

Contract between The Friendly Dawg and landlord Lou
Analyze the scenario to determine whether a valid contract still exists between The Friendly Dawg and
landlord Lou.
Explain the elements of a valid contract, and identify which contract elements, if any, exist between The
Friendly Dawg and landlord Lou.
Analyze the potential rights, claims, defenses, obligations, and remedies available to both
landlord Lou and The Friendly Dawg in this scenario.

Support your analysis by referencing specific legal principles or laws.
Contract between Sunshine Yoga and landlord Lou
Analyze the scenario to determine whether a valid contract still exists between Sunshine Yoga and
landlord Lou.

Explain the elements of a valid contract, and identify which contract elements, if any, exist between
Sunshine Yoga and landlord Lou.

Analyze the potential rights, claims, defenses, obligations, and remedies available to both
landlord Lou and Sunshine Yoga in this scenario.
Support your analysis by referencing specific legal principles or laws.

Grounds to evict
Describe whether, based on your analysis of each party’s rights and obligations, landlord Lou has the
grounds to evict either The Friendly Dawg or Sunshine Yoga.
Support your conclusions by referencing specific legal principles or laws.

Include a References section and cite your sources using APA style.
Tort Law

 

Evaluate the implications of tort law in this scenario and what legal claims Sunshine Yoga might have.

Use reliable resources, such as the textbook and other course resources, to support your evaluation.

Specifically, include the following components in your evaluation:

Tort law: Define what tort law is and how torts may affect business practices.

Relevant tort laws: Identify tort laws relevant to the scenario, specifically the incident involving the
snake.
Legal claims
Identify what legal claims Sunshine Yoga might have against The Friendly Dawg and landlord Lou, based

on those tort laws and related legal principles.

Support your conclusions by referencing the applicable tort laws and related legal principles.

 

BUS 206 SNHU Tort Law and Contract Law essay case study.

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.