- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaybasket.com
BU 38880 IMCs Board of Directors Discussion essay case study.
BU 38880 IMCs Board of Directors Discussion essay case study.
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
BU 38880 IMCs Board of Directors Discussion essay case study.
IMC's Board of Directors
You have been elected to Investment Management Corporation’s (IMC) board of directors. The boardconsists of five members. Recently, by a vote of four in favor and one opposed (you were the one
opposed), the board voted to give annual college scholarships in the amount of $100,000 to local
students. Last year, IMC made a profit of $2 million dollars, but the board did not vote to give
shareholders dividends. You are concerned that some of the other board members have violated the
business judgment rule in making their decision, based on the following additional facts about the four
board members who voted in favor of the annual scholarships:Peter, who works as a guidance counselor, is newly elected to the board and has only been on the board
for one month. Peter has made a cursory review of corporate records. Peter is very good friends with
the CEO, who recommended in favor of the vote. Peter also has two children, ages 16 and 17.Paul, an advertising executive, is a very busy man and attends about four meetings a year. The board
meets every month. Paul has been on the board for 10 years and stays in touch with the CEO wheneverhe is out of town.
Mary, a CPA, has been a board member for three years. Mary just returned from a trip to Europe. After
two hours of sleep, Mary reviewed all corporate records before voting.Janice, a retired high school teacher, serves on many corporate boards of directors. Some of the
corporations are competitors of IMC.
Instructions:
For your initial response, prepare an argument against one or more of the board members, suggestingthat the member(s) has (have) violated the business judgment rule.
Be sure to discuss the member’s fiduciary duties and explain which duty or duties the member(s) may
have violated and explain why
Include any assumptions you have made.Post replies to at least two other students.
You can politely agree or disagree.
You must include new information in your replies to further the discussion.Doing more than the minimum will enhance your grade.
All posts are to be substantial, incorporate course concepts, and relate to the discussion issue.
You might also want to conduct some independent research to enhance your posts.
Submission Details:
Post your initial response (250-300 words)
(The discussion Assignment is due tomorrow at 11:59pm ET so start on this first)Peer Responses
(Respond to each of the two students. Use 150-200 words when responding to students, Start off with
("hello Name").
*(The students haven't posted their Discussion posts yet but when they do, I will give them to you so
you can respond to them)Lexis Nexis Assignment
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The purpose of this problem assignment is for you to become familiar with how to use the Securities andExchange Commission (SEC) website to investigate information on various publicly traded corporations
and to use the LexisNexis database to explore statutory law pertaining to corporations in the state youselected in the Week 2 LexisNexis Assignment. The SEC website is also useful for exploring companies
you may want to invest in. You will be preparing a brief report consisting of two sections.
*The Instructions and the assignment matrix are attached below
*(This Assignment is important so if you can't guarantee quality work then don't bid. if instructions are
not followed then the assignment will be refunded.)
BU 38880 IMCs Board of Directors Discussion essay case study.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
