AU Capitalism Theory and Map Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
AU Capitalism Theory and Map Essay
Instructions for Midterm Project
Most social theories worth studying are neither completely correct nor completely mistaken. They are a mix of ideas that are useful for understanding our world and ideas that need to be revised or thrown out entirely. This midterm project is designed to help you develop the skill and value of thoughtful ambivalence, that is, the ability to assess theories with more nuance, by pointing out what is useful and what is unhelpful about them. You will develop this skill by deciding what Marx got right about capitalism and what he got wrong.
The instructions below take you through each step you should take to develop your project.
Step 1: Read the Ten Economic Portraits Published in The New York Times
In April 2020, The New York Times asked some of its readers in their 40s how they were doing financially compared to how their parents were doing in their 40s. The newspaper then published an article with ten of these “economic portraits “ (they received nearly 500 in total). The first step in developing your midterm project is to read these ten portraits, which you will find on Canvas.
Step 2: Decide Whether Marx Was Right (on a Scale from 1-3)?
Think carefully about the economic lives of the people that you just read. Based on these portraits, the readings you’ve done on Marx, and your own experience and viewpoints, do you believe Marx presented an accurate description of capitalism? I don’t want you to answer this question in terms of ‘yes’ or ‘no.’
I want you to score Marx’s theory on a scale from 1 to 3, with 1 meaning that Marx was mostly wrong and 3 meaning that he was mostly right. For every point you give Marx’s theory, you must point out a specific argument or idea you believe he got right, explain that argument or idea, and support it with information from the portraits. Similarly, for every point you don’t give him, you must point out an argument or idea you think he got wrong, explain it, and support it with information from the portraits.
You may choose to discuss any argument or idea from Marx’s work, including his views on ideology, class struggle, class polarization, primitive accumulation, the relation between political equality and economic inequality, or any other argument or idea found in any of the readings by Marx that you did for this class.
The key is that for each point you give his theory (or don’t) you must select a specific argument or idea from Marx’s work, explain it, state whether you believe he’s right or wrong about that argument or idea, and support your analysis with information from the portraits.
You might say something like this:
“Marx argued that capitalism increases inequality. For example, on p.X of the Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels state that… What the authors are saying in this passage is that… I believe Marx was right about this because… In fact, one of the portraits illustrates this since [name of person] is…”
In the example above, the first three sentences explain the argument in Marx’s theory you’re referring to. The fourth sentence states your position about that argument (was Marx right or wrong?). The last sentence draws on the portraits to support your view.
If you give Marx’s theory a score of three, you must mention three things you believe he got right about capitalism. If you give it a score of two, you must point out two things he got right about capitalism and one he got wrong. If you give it a score of one, you must point out one thing he got right and two he got wrong.
Step 3: Present Your Analysis as a Theory Map or a Mini-Ted Talk
The final step is to present your analysis integrating Marx’s theory of capitalism with the information provided in the economic portraits. You can present your analysis as a theory map or a mini-Ted Talk. Regardless of the format, the central goal is to explain the things you believe Marx got right and the ones you believe he got wrong and to draw on the economic portraits to illustrate your views.
Your work should contain at least three specific page citations from Marx’s work and three citations from any of the economic portraits. Ideally, you will support your view about each point in your score with one citation from Marx and one citation from the economic portraits.
You can include more citations if you like, but the latter numbers are the minimum. You will also have to include a reference list regardless of the format you choose. In-text citations and reference list entries should follow the style guide produced by the American Sociological Association (ASA). You will find a description of this style in the document titled “Quick Tips for ASA Style,” which has been uploaded to Canvas.
This is how The New York Times article should be listed in your references list:
Kelley, Lora. 2020. “‘I Am the Portrait of Downward Mobility.’” The New York Times, April 17.
Below, you’ll find further instructions for each format.
At its most basic level, a theory map is a visualization that presents the main ideas of a theory and how they are connected to each other using images, text boxes, lines, arrows, and other visual cues. Your map should represent what you believe Marx got right and what he got wrong about capitalism. In other words, it should represent the score on a 1-
3 scale you gave the theory and draw on the information found in the economic portraits.
You can hand-draw your map and submit it as a photograph or you can produce it on a digital device using any software you like. If you chose to use a digital device and decide to use images instead of or in addition to text boxes, you can create the images yourself or use existing images you find online.
You may create a single map that illustrates all the points in your score or create a separate map for each point.
In addition to the map itself, you must submit a 500-word summary of your map that includes a total of three specific citations from any of the works we read by Marx (or Marx and Engels) to support your analysis and three citations from the economic portraits. As I mentioned above, ideally, you will support your view about each point in your score with one citation from Marx and one citation from the economic portraits for a total of six citations in your 500-word summary (three from Marx and three from the portraits). Even if you create more than one map to illustrate your score, you only need to write one 500-word summary.
You should also include a reference list that does not count toward the 500-word limit following the ASA style guide.
Your summary should have the following general structure:
In one or two sentences, present your score and a brief, general evaluation of
Marx’s Theory. Here’s an example of what this might look like: “I gave Marx’s theory of capitalism a score of 2 because Marx was largely correct about X and Y, though he did get Z wrong.”
Explain each of the points in your score, laying out the specific arguments and ideas from Marx’s work, whether he got them right or wrong, and describing how you decided to illustrate them in your map. You might say something like this: “Marx claims that under capitalism, people are ideologically manipulated. On p.XX of [Title of Reading] he argues that… I don’t believe he got this right. In my map, I illustrate Marx’s idea of ideology with the image of XX in the top- left corner of the map. But I place a “=?” symbol between this image and the text box to the left of the symbol to indicate that ideology does not necessarily produce the effect Marx thought it would. The text box to the right of the symbol includes the name of [name of one of the people from the portraits] because her views do not support the argument that she’s ideologically manipulated in any way. In fact, she clearly states that…”
Throughout your summary, remember to describe the text boxes and/or images in your map and how they are connected to each other, define any key concepts you refer to in your map, and follow ASA style guidelines when citing Marx’s work in the summary.
AU Capitalism Theory and Map Essay
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.