- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaybasket.com
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
Instructions
Respond to two students’ posts as well with posts that are a minimum of 100 words. Each student posts
Your response to your peers should be at least 100 words and advance the historical dialogue at hand
Make Sure to Address Readings in Your Discussion Responses:
Response post essay 1
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
I think it is very important for historian and history classes to teach about the effect of Atomic bomb. Now we know the race for atomic bomb during the World War 2.
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
The countries like Germany and USA both were racing for a weapon to decide the faith of World War 2. After months of testing in New Mexico Americans were able to build the first atomic bomb and deployed it to Asia. After the claps of German regime American had to finish the fight in Asia, due to high US Marin casualties in Japan, American decided to drop Atomic bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
I think Japan made a mistake joining Germans to attack USA. It is very unfortunate that the bomb was used in japan and hundred thousand of people instantly died and hundreds of thousand suffered from the effect of chemicals after. Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
I think American had a chance to win the war without using the bomb demolishing a city full of innocent civilians in both cities, the reason I think that is, by the time American used the bomb, the War in Europe was over.
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
What they could have done was to ask the allied countries to finish the war in Japan to prevent that mass distraction and taking civilian lives.
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case studyThe nuclear capabilities are hundred thousand time higher in the world, if any incident occur the distraction would be unimaginably greater than we think.
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
Response post essay 2
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
Man, reading this while processing the week’s current events was a bad time, two thumbs down. I respect the necessity but I could understand if there were some that simply did not have the bandwidth.
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
After reading both Hersey and Stillmans works on the matter, I can’t help but think that I don’t have the license to speak about how it should be interpreted. As a white woman living in America that, knock on wood after the last few days, probably will not witness nuclear warfare, I can’t speak to the nature of the trauma these people endured. I read the retellings of that month and I try to quantify what the physical and emotional cost was but I cannot fully grasp the magnitude of it. All that I can do is to trust my own interpretation of it and hope that the circulation of Hersey’s work is widespread. As for how it should be taught, I think it’s paramount for these first-hand recollections of what happened to be the highlight. I believe that the politics and figures at the time were of significance but the most important thing is that these people’s truths and pain are not overshadowed by the decision-making process itself. We should read these people’s accounts of what the true outcome was and work backward from there, keeping them in the foreground. I think the evolution of warfare is paradoxical in that it’s simultaneously the most inhumane yet human thing about our species.
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
I have a feeling of “Shikata ga nai”, to quote Stillman when it comes to the question of what cities should have been hit. It was already done and speculation about the ethics of location doesn’t change what was done. I could hear the argument that it may be necessary for a conversation on ethics in general but I think it’s also flimsy in that the answer is obvious. I think more thought-provoking questions can be found in Stillman’s work where the generational trauma of war is examined.
Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima And Nagasaki History case study
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
