Assessment Strategy, Training and Development
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Training & Development HRM-303
Group Project 30% – Week 12 (Friday 17th April 2020)
This element of course assessment accounts for 30% of your final mark. You are required to write a report no more than 2500 words (including the cover page, references and appendices) and submit it online through the course VLE by the deadline. In preparing your group assignment, you are expected to reflect on your own learning and provide in-depth analysis of the chosen topic. The key assessment criteria for your group project are the course learning outcomes. This means that you need to reflect on your learning in your group project with regard to each of the learning outcomes (K1, K2, RC1, S1 & S2). A reflection on your own learning from the course, embedding it into the report, and ability to link it with the course learning outcomes constitute a key element of your assignment evaluation and marking.
Topic of group project
Assume that your group is an independent group of consultants and your expertise is concerned with T&D within the MENA-based organizations. You are invited by a UAE-based organization to Design, Develop, Implement and Evaluate a Training Program of your choice to this organization
Instructions for preparation
To complete your project task, choose any company of your choice, provide a general description of the company, suggest a training program for this company, design a training program, develop it, implement and finally evaluate it. You can use the following points to guide you in your writing process. Please use the chapters 1-7 from the e-book as a reference.
Step 1: Design (6 marks)
Decide on the paradigm / approach / model / theory you will adopt or adapt in designing your training program that addresses certain needs. Your chosen model will determine the goals / objectives of your training program.(ADDIE)
Based on the chosen teaching-learning model, decide on the learning objectives of each task, the expected learning outcomes of each objective, and how you will measure the performance of the targeted trainees while conducting the targeted task.
The learning outcomes should be measurable and observable. To do this, use rubrics for the assessment of all assigned tasks, quizzes and tests. Your assessment should be summative and formative oriented.
Also required is to assess your trainees entry level. To this end, design a pre-test to measure the entry existing KSAs of the trainees.
Based on the results of the pre-diagnosing assessment, develop the training objectives for each required task.
Step 2: Develop (6 marks):
Decide and justify delivery method
Based on the chosen learning-teaching theory and the targeted objectives, develop the instructional materials, handouts, videos, etc. that allow students to acquire the required KSAs and accomplish the targeted measurable and observable learning outcomes.
Your choice of the instructional-learning materials should be competency, evidence, and performance-based which allow trainees to demonstrate the acquisition of the required KSAs. i.e., develop a competency-profile that reflects the required targeted KSAs.
Based on the targeted profile, develop instructional modules and a curriculum guide that includes step by step manual of all the lessons and supporting multimedia materials that will be used.
Step 3: Implementation (6 marks)
Prepare the training site
Conduct the training program according to your developed structured hourly plan.
Conduct a formative and summative assessment.
Document learners performance for further evaluation.
Step 4: Program Evaluation (6 marks)
Collect, analyze, interpret and evaluate the data that relates to:
o transfer of training
Describe and justify your evaluation design
Consider internal and external validity threats
Based on your evaluation, generate recommendations for future improvement
Highlight the ROI of the program
Structure and organization of the written group project
Cover page (logo of the university, title and code of the course, topic of your group project your name, student number, date of submission, word count)
Introduction (which describe your group assignment and aim of your project and why it is important)
Body (which discuss the four steps).
Summary: analysis, main findings and what you have learned from this assignment.
References (cite your references both in the main text and in the list of references in accordance with the Harvard Referencing System).
In addition to online submission, you are expected to give a 30-minute presentation of your group project during the virtual on week 13 (21st April 2020). So every group member needs to present one part of the group assignment, should have equal contribution to the project in terms of the written and presentation, be aware of its content and be ready to take questions from your fellow classmates and your course instructor. (6 marks)
Rubric for the written group project and group presentation
Please refer to the rubric files
Based on the above assessment criteria you will be awarded a grade shown in the grading scheme of the course syllabus (i.e. A, B+, B, C+, C & F see the course syllabus for more details). Please make sure to prepare, write and submit your own assignment and DO NOT copy others or do not use any previously submitted assignments for this or other courses. In order to prevent plagiarism, we use Turnitin software. A trunitin similarity rate of <10% is acceptable. So please observe the University policy for preparing and submitting your assignments.
Note: to have your draft proofread for any typos/grammatical errors, to use Font 12, Times New Roman 1.5 line space, and fully justified text. Watch for Turnitin similarity rate of your submission (it has to be below 10%). Do not exceed the suggested word limit and do not send email to ask for exceeding the word limit. No late submission will be accepted for whatever reason.
Best of luck
Dr. Mohammed Ghadi
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.