Analysis of Shareholder Primacy Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Analysis of Shareholder Primacy Assignment
KIMBERLY’S POST:
Discuss the pros and cons of the shareholder-primacy and director-primacy models of corporate governance. Which do you prefer and why?
Shareholder primacy is a shareholder-centric form of corporate governance that focuses on maximizing the value of shareholders before considering the interests of other corporate stakeholders, such as society, the community, consumers, and employees.
Director primacy places priority to give board members independent power to pursue organizational interest for the shareholders.
Shareholder pros- Internal stakeholders with a large, vested interest in a business often sit on the board of directors. This stakeholder’s value is partially his business experience and partially his book of business relationships. The business acumen an experienced business leader has is highly beneficial for a business owner. Not only can the stakeholder offer mentoring advice, but the stakeholder can also help guide the company to grow properly and not make costly mistakes along the way.
Shareholder cons- Corporate decisions and strategy may transition into reaching short-term goals, which may result in hasty decision-making and decisions characterized by short-term incentives and bonuses to meet certain targets. Lack of willingness to take on risks and invest in new technologies may limit the growth of corporations and the potential to improve overall well-being with better products.
More dividends paid out by corporations to provide income to shareholders instead of using the generated cash to make more and better strategic investment decisions, research, and development.
Director primacy pros- It eases decision-making capability; it helps to maximize shareholder returns. Extensive professional experience.
Director primacy cons- It cannot expand the role of shareholders. Unrestricted power.
I would prefer shareholders primacy because it gives you the power in decision making. Also, shareholders can influence the business strategic decisions and is able to negotiate the level of influence in the firm.
JEFFRION’S POST:
Discuss the pros and cons of the shareholder-primacy and director-primacy models of corporate governance. Which do you prefer and why?
Shareholder-primacy is a theory in corporate governance holding that shareholder interests should be assigned first priority relative to all other corporate stakeholders.
Pros of shareholder-primacy is that it gives you directly contact with the corporate decision making and the power to amend things.
Cons of shareholder-primacy will be the clashing of the corporate and the shareholders with the creditors.
Director-primacy is board-centric, but shareholder wealth focused.
Pros of director-primacy shows power of directors to manage the corporation and their obligation to do so in the shareholders’ interest creates a variant of the principal-agent problem.
Cons of director-primacy is a core tension between the board’s authority and the need to ensure that the board uses its authority responsibly.
Restructuring
You are required to respond to at least two of your peers’ initial posts with a substantial response. Responses to peers should be at least two paragraphs and be substantive in nature. Substantive means that you should add something to the discussion, referring to the original post. Referring to any reading or other scholarship is always a plus.
o Respond to two different peers are initial posts, other than yourself. That is required and you will lose points if you do not participate to this minimum extent.
Guided Response: Assume the role of the employee and respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by discussing your perception of the communication strategies chosen.
DYANI’S POST:
One of the most challenging tasks in organizations is communication. Employees commonly express their dissatisfaction with this area throughout organizational change and day-to-day operations (Heathfield, 2021).
This week’s lectures advise that communication is essential for change implementation and long-term success. According to Palmer et al. (2021), one of the most mentioned change drivers is communication, which explains why change is necessary and how it will be accomplished. On the contrary, a major cause of change failure is a lack of communication.
Personnel changes can also affect people on a personal level thus it is important to determine how much information should be shared and any potential benefits to the change.
In the past, I have been tasked with communicating personnel changes within my organization and many times the information was rarely positive. Communication regarding organizational changes should always be a two-way channel. In my organization we host town hall meetings, which has been effective when communicating personnel changes as it provides a platform for questions and answers.
Communicating the reasons for the personnel changes so that everyone understands the framework, purpose, and necessity is essential. For change managers, it is also important to determine factors that could affect coding and decoding when planning a communication strategy, and to tailor text information and channels accordingly (Palmer et al., 2021).
A change management communication plan should be developed by leaders who are conveying organizational changes to employees. The way leaders communicate with employees about changes must be deemed significant and held to the same standard as the change process overall.
Communicating change can be difficult. Whether the company is going through organizational changes such as adjusting to remote work due to COVID, positive encouragement from leadership is essential. Whatever the change, providing employees with a boost in morale by seeing them adapt and overcome the changes is critical.
Finally, the liaison should make time to be available to employees, maintaining open lines of communication and being willing to listen at all times.
References:
Heathfield, S. (2021). Communication in Change Management. The Balance Careers. Retrieved from https://www.thebalancecareers.com/communication-in-change-management-1917805
Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Buchanan, D. (2022). Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Analysis of Shareholder Primacy Assignment
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.