A History of Piute County
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
A History of Piute County
You will select an academic-quality secondary source book related to your topic and produce a formal book review. A book review is not a book summary;
instead, it is an analysis of the author’s thesis and supporting evidence and an evaluation of how well that author constructed that argument. The book review
should be 1,000 to 1,500 words long (three to five pages). You will propose a book for approval in Week 3. The final book review assignment is due by the end of
Week 6.
A History of Piute County
One of the tasks that historians do is to review the work of other historians, primarily the books they write. Book reviews are very common and can be found in
most academic-level journals that focus on historical topics. Book reviews tell the reader what the book author’s argument/thesis was, what evidence they used
to prove their thesis, and if they were successful in their argument. Book reviews also give the reader a general sense of the book’s subject material.
Journals include book reviews as they are a very efficient and rapid way for historians to see what has been printed in book form in their field, far quicker than the
historian finding and reading every book that gets published. Book reviews are read by just about everyone working in a field related to History: professors,
museum staff, historically themed national and state park staff, documentarians, and teachers in the K-12 levels. So, all of you who go on to work in a history
related job should start reading book reviews as part of your normal continuing education as a historian as they allow you to see what has recently been
published, and they alert you to books you might want to read for work or pleasure.
A History of Piute County
Your assignment is to find a secondary source book (in either printed or electronic form) and write a 1000-to-1500-word (4 to 6 pages) review of the book. Your
review should use essay form and be double spaced with one-inch margins.
A book review should do the following things:
- In the first paragraph state the author’s name and the title of the book. Also, in the first paragraph state the author’s thesis (their overall argument).
- In your supporting points (the body of your review), summarize the sub-arguments the author used to prove their thesis.
- Describe the primary sources the author used in their supporting points.
- Evaluate the author’s success: did their evidence prove their thesis? Was their thesis/argument convincing? This should come in your concluding paragraph.
An academic-level book review is not just a summary of the book (similar to what you might have done in K-12 classes). Instead, it is an evaluation of whether or not the book produced a convincing argument and how the author did so (or failed to do so). Don’t be afraid as an undergraduate student to feel your book failed to successfully prove its argument. About half of the books reviewed in academic journals get a poor to dismal review.
There are a couple of steps in this assignment:
- In Week 3, you should state what book you wish to read for your book review. Post the book in a full bibliographic entry by the end of Week 3. You may post your book earlier, which is good as I might want you to find a different book. In addition to the bibliographic entry for your book, tell me how it is related to your topic and why it is a secondary source. Remember that you need to pick a secondary source book related to your topic.
- In Weeks 4 and 5, you should read your book, cover to cover, with your book review requirements in mind. Don’t skim your book. Make sure you fully understand what the book’s thesis is before you start reading the chapters containing the supporting points. You will typically find the thesis in the opening pages of the preface or introduction. Authors often make this easy for you. Look for phrases like this: “This book will argue …” “I contest that view and offer …” “This book provides a new approach …”
- In Week 6 (feel free to start earlier), write your book review as it is due by the end of Week 6. Submit your assignment via this assignment.
A History of Piute County
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
A History of Piute County
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.