Should Canada Change its Electoral System Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Should Canada Change its Electoral System Essay
Should, Canada, Change, Electoral, System, Essay
A True Democracy Needs Proportional Representation Essay
As Canada stands in the modern world our electoral system remains in the dark ages. Canada’s current first past the post system or single member plurality destroys the meaning of democracy. majority governments are formed without most of the vote, thus clearing the way for misrepresentation and manipulation of people’s desired representation.
This paper will be arguing that Canada must reform its electoral system to properly represent the diverse views within the vast boundaries of the Canadian confederation.
For Canada to truly become a democracy we must reform this ancient system of first past the post to a proportional representative system so every Canadian’s voice is heard and has an impact in policies and legislation that effects every Canadian citizen.
First past the post (FPTP) is an unsuitable electoral system for the diverse landscape of Canada on any level of government, because it throws away the voices of so many people in its process to form a government. “In 1993, the voters repudiated the ruling progressive Conservatives, but got the electoral system almost decimated Canada’s oldest party.
Rather than electing 46 members a proportional system would have given them, the Tories ended up with only two” according to Henry Milner’s (1999, P. 38) book Making Every Vote Count: Reassessing Canada’s electoral system.
This is a perfect example of how FPTP destroys the equality of people’s votes, the shameful electoral system we have implemented in Canada discriminates against most of the populations vote. This means that when a government is formed it does not actually represent the people of Canada.
This one-sided electoral system throws away so many votes in its process, It Makes peoples votes feel meaningless and discourage people from voting.
With proportional representation (PR) people have the freedom and confidence to vote for who they want instead of voting strategically to prevent the person they disfavor most from getting into power.
This is best expressed by Derriennic, Jean Pierre (2016) “people can express a sincere first preference, even if it goes to a candidate who has no chance of winning, then rank other candidates in order of preference, with voter’s last favorite last. sincere voting is effective, whereas strategic voting is almost never useful.”
With these new options that PR gives it allows people to vote for who they want in order of most favorable to non-favorable, this takes away the discrimination that small parties face in the FPTP system we currently have. PR would encourage a larger turn out among voters because they would feel like that have more of an impact and chance at getting someone into office that best represents their values.
Having a PR system would benefit Canada because it would better show the true wants of all Canadians by better translating votes into representatives and lessening the wasted vote.
The most damning problem with FPTP is that the voices, concerns and desires of many people are ignored. The blatant ignorance that the FPTP system is found on leads to the injustice and abuse of the electoral system by big parties. This limits the allowed positions people can take in elections, forcing individuals to sacrifice some values to have others addressed in the way they want.
If we had a PR, then smaller parties would be able to get the representation they deserve. without the heavy prejudice that FPTP has on the electoral system, this is seen time and time again against the green party. The formation and ability of smaller parties to have proper representation would allow for more diverse and better representation of Canadian’s views and wants from government.
Canada prides its self of the freedoms granted to its citizens so it should hold fair and non-discriminating elections so that every vote is heard and weighted the same. Canada must allow every voice to be heard with the use of a PR system. “Almost all democracies, apart from Canada, now incorporate some element of proportional representation (“PR”) into their systems.
A system is fully consistent with PR principles if a party that wins X percentage of the popular vote also wins X percentage of the seats.” (Schwartz, Bryan. Pg. 133, (2001)). This quote shows how disruptive FPTP is to a democracy, the injustice and the way it distorts the popular vote to seats.
With PR in Canada, Canada would be forced to hear everyone’s voice, Canada under a PR system would unite, as a nation, making parties work together relentlessly to find the best solutions to difficult problems that impact all Canadians. PR would grant people the ability to have greater impact on their own representation in Canada.
Empowering smaller parties who have views that more closely represent the people of Canada. Creating a more democratic society, where no minority’s go unheard. Proportional Representation is the only viable option for Canada given all the diversity within its self.
Canada is a nation that has the second largest territory in the world, but only a population of 37 million as of July 1,2018 according to Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada (2018)). This Translates to the population being spread out to an extreme degree.
Allowing for diverse and extremely different views across the nation on many topics. Proportional Representation would allow for a deeper and more accurate representation. “the SMP system is no longer considered fair because a political party can obtain 100% of the power with less than 50% of the votes.” (Couture, Liz (2014)) PR Would allow for a government to represent all the voters that express what that want Canada to stand for, not just one group of Canadians wishes.
With minorities being better represented Canada, we would hear the voices the electoral system has overlooked with FPTP. “especially at higher levels of district magnitude, the translation of votes into seats is less distorted, thereby increasing voter feelings of efficacy.”
(Cox, Gary W. ; Fiva, Jon H. ; Smith, Daniel M (2016)) with greater efficacy people would care more about voting and elections. People would Have a sense of meaning that the current FPTP system just cannot muster in people. With greater turnout of voters, it would produce an even more repetitive government and make all voices apparent in the house of commons.
Canada Must move forward to Proportional Representation electoral system. Canadian votes should not be distorted to fit the agendas of political parties. The government should be an equal representation of the Canadians wants, values and desires shown in the votes casted by Canadians.
Canadas electoral system is unjust and destroys the meaning of democracy. Canadian’s should have power to hold the government accountable and enforce a fair and just elections. This can only be done threw a Proportional Representation. Then Canada will be a true democracy where every voice across Canada can have an impact and be meaningful in shaping the future of Canada.
Bibliography Cox, G., Fiva, J., & Smith, D. (2016). The Contraction Effect: How Proportional Representation Affects Mobilization and Turnout. The Journal of Politics, 78(4), 1249-1263. Couture, L. (2014).
Proportional Representation: Redeeming the Democratic Deficit. The Innovation Journal, 19(1), 1-12. Schwartz, Bryan. (2001). Proportional representation for Canada?(Underneath the Golden Boy: A Review of Recent Manitoba Laws and How They Came to Be)(Canada)(Statistical Data Included).
Manitoba Law Journal, 28(2), 133-183. Milner, H., & Canadian Electronic Library. (1999). Making every vote count : Reassessing Canada’s electoral system (Canadian Electronic Library. Canadian publishers collection). Peterborough, Ont., Canada ; Orchard Park, N.Y.: Broadview Press. Derriennic, Jean Pierre. (2016).
A Better Electoral System for Canada: Moderate Proportional Representation With Ranked Ballots. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 39(4), 27-29. Statistics Canada,The Annual Demographic Estimates: Canada, Provinces and Territories, 2018 (total population only) (Catalogue number91-215-X)Ottawa, Ontario.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Should Canada Change its Electoral System Essay
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.