HA540 Integrating Quality and Strategy in Health Care Organizations
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
HA540 Integrating Quality and Strategy in Health Care Organizations
HA540, Integrating, Quality, Strategy, Health, Care, Organizations
In not less than 250 words respond:
It is your duty to find out what are some of the external variants that influence the quality with healthcare organizations including your hospital. List some of the external elements that affect your quality and why.
You have a meeting to discuss quality initiatives and how to increase your level of impact from the external elements. How would you prepare and what would you present at the meeting as the new quality improvement director?
In two different paragraph using their own references give your personal opinion to Marivette Bedoya and Dianna Adair
External elements that have an impact on quality include government organizations that set quality measurements and requirements, patient socio-demographics, environmental factors, and more. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, or AHRQ, provides 4 quality measurement sets in various healthcare settings to allow quality to be measured.
The National Quality Measures Clearinghouse is another such organization that lists all evidence-based measures (Sadeghi, Barzi, Mikhail, & Shabot, 2013). While these organizations do not directly affect the quality of healthcare organizations, they do provide valuable information that allows for improvement of quality, which is technically external influence.
Environmental factors such as available resources and pricing and collaboration with other healthcare businesses in the area have a more direct impact on quality. Resource availability determines the quality of medical supplies, which can, in turn, impact quality of patient care.
More durable and functional supplies results in better outcomes. Collaboration with other healthcare businesses affects quality by altering the company’s culture. An organization might change the way it handles conflicts or manages patient care based on its partnerships in order to remain compatible with partners (Mosadeghrad, 2014).
At a meeting as the quality director, I would first consider if increasing impact of external elements would be beneficial. Is increasing that impact always a good thing if external influences are negative?
I would prepare a report based on the environmental situation of the community, socio-economic demographics, supply chain, local competition, and information regarding any partnerships our organization is involved in. It would be beneficial to discuss how we can use these factors to our advantage and change the narrative of negative impacts to reflect positively on our organization.
Even when things are bad, PR firms can illustrate the positives of bad situations. As an example, say there is a high rate of deaths due to a communicable disease in the area.
Our hospital knows that there isn’t much positive about that, but we could highlight our efficient testing methods and cutting-edge treatment options for affected individuals. This would raise morale among employees and let them know they are doing a good job with a bad situation and potentially increase quality of care due to the morale boost.
Mosadeghrad A. M. (2014). Factors Affecting Medical Service Quality. Iranian journal of public health, 43(2), 210–220.
Sadeghi, S., Barzi, A., Mikhail, O., & Shabot, M. M. (2013). Integrating Quality and Strategy in Health Care Organizations. Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
Several external variants that influence the quality of healthcare organizations are technology, economics, politics, government, and environmental factors. By effectively evaluating these factors, organizations can use them as tools to implement proper planning, education, training, management of resources, process and improve quality of services.
Organizations must have current, reliable technology to provide patient care, improve and provide quality of services, compete and survive in the market, provide employment and meet certain obligations. By monitoring or staying updated, new technological devices, like patient data scanners, mobile technology and other medical equipment, an organization can create and maintain a system or environment that responds effectively to patients needs or concerns all while improving quality of care.
The state of our economy directly ties into resource availability for healthcare systems (organizations/providers), accessibility, and affordability for patients. For instance, during an economic downturn, some employers may have to change their healthcare cost-sharing benefits in effort to reduce costs (Oner, 2016).
A change in politics may also result in a change of regulations. As such, quality outcomes are largely based on the healthcare organizations ability to adapt to the change and stay in compliance with government regulations. The environment also largely influences quality in healthcare organizations because elements such as air and water quality, population growth, climate change, and wide-spread poverty, can increase health risks and the demand for health providers.
Insurance companies can be an external variant that would impact the perception of quality at hospital organizations. In order to mitigate the external variant, I would implement a process to take the burden off the patient to handle rejected claims. Be in contact to let them know the course of action, and keep them up to date.
The patient is more apt to be satisfied knowing the hoops and all of the actions that were taken on their behalf to ensure insurance pays for the services rendered. As a director, I would work with the employees and providers to ensure that all charting is up-to-date and comprehensive to ensure that claims being challenged by carriers have a complete picture of the patient’s health. This would increase the approval process.
Oner, N. (2016). Organizational and Environmental Factors Associated with Hospital Financial Performance: A S
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
HA540 Integrating Quality and Strategy in Health Care Organizations
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.