- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaybasket.com
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
I’m working on a psychology multi-part question and need guidance to help me learn.
watch the hoarder’s episode and answer the following questions.
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
Video Selection:
A Beautiful Mind
One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
The Soloist
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
The Bad Seed
Words on Bathroom Walls
1 episode of “Hoarders”
I am Someone’s Child, The Regina Louise Story
The Father
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
Thin
What is the name of the main character or focus of the video?
Describe the setting(s) and environment in which the main character is generally featured.
What behaviors, that the main character exhibits, appear to be typical of most people of a similar age in similar environments?
What behaviors that the main character exhibits, appear to be atypical of most people of a similar age in similar environments?
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
Using the DSM-5, what diagnoses or psychological disorder(s) appear to be appropriate for the main character based on the atypical behaviors you have described? Cite the definition of the diagnosed condition according to the DSM-5.
What treatments are recommended for this diagnosed psychological disorder as articulated in the DSM-5.
What are the expected behavioral outcomes for the main character if the recommended treatments are followed by the main character?
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
demonstrate your ability to use an ECERs tool. Since it is not yet consistently feasible to visit centers in person, this assignment will be based on videos of an environment at another community college (Reedley). They have generously made them available for our use. Additionally, they have provided supplemental narrative information about the center (included below) which will enable you to complete your rating.
VIDEO EXPLANATION OF HOW TO COMPLETE THE ASSIGNMENT (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)*
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
*You can ignore the one statement where it says you must attend a “session”, this was made for another section that had a required meeting covering what you already learned about in the video lectures.
DIRECTIONS
While viewing the classroom videos linked below, use the ECERS-3 rating sheets for items 1, 2, 4, 5, 16, and 18 to rate the classroom depicted in the videos and score each
item using the ECERS 3 Scoring Sheet which you will find just below the rating sheets. Remember, you must use BOTH documents at the same time. The videos provided
will give you the information needed to score sheet the items. Make sure you read the notes of clarification which will provide additional information that may not be apparent
in the videos.
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
You will need to watch these videos multiple times (as many times as you need to get complete information). You will gain information for numerous measures in each video,
in other words, each video does NOT correspond to a specific Item. You will NOT be able to fill out the ECERS entirely if you try to watch only the videos you think correspond
to the Item #s on the scoring sheet.
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
You can use any means you are comfortable with to fill out the ECERS. You can print, write your score in and then upload the pictures, or use some of the formatting options
available in Microsoft word. If you are struggling with filling the document in, please contact me ASAP.
Some parts will ask about interactions observed. Since this is not a live observation, you have my permission to make this part up. I’m most interested in your understanding
of the scoring system.
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
Do your very best to combine all of your sheets into ONE document prior to submitting.
** There are not many 7’s on the score sheet; please make sure you read and apply what you have learned. Completing an ECERS WILL be something you will do as a
classroom teacher.****
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaybasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Scoresheet
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
